blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 29,405
Its already been discussed we have the money for a striker, there has been nothing to suggest we spent money on Grealish instead. In fact we carried on trying to buy Kane after we bought Grealish. The only suggestion we used the striker money on Grealish instead is in your and some other imaginations.It's already been discussed that we will replace Mendy by buying a full back, he'll be in prison and won't play for City again!
We may or may not buy a left back, if we sell Sterling we might replace him we might not, seems like we might sell Torres so we will have that too. Who knows Bernardos thinking.
Money isn’t an issue, still doesn’t mean we will spend more on Haaland or anyone else than we want to.
As our transfer policy has delivered 3 titles out of 4 and we are top of the league and won our c/l group, maybe the transfer team have proved their competence ?