Looks like Alfie & Mino are putting their, and Erling’s, financial future in place IF the reports of a 3 yr deal are anywhere close to accurate.
I can only assume that it is incorrect as reported, as it would mean amortization of his deal over a significantly shorter period, and thus much more costly on a FFP basis.
I MIGHT be able to see where, after 3 years, a suitably large Release Clause is put in place to recoup investment AND allow him to move on. That would allow the three of them to get another large payday, and City to get both a nice transfer fee and a large opening in our wage bill for a potential replacement.
However, it’s hard to see how City could accept anything other than an initial 5-6 year deal, even if only for the purposes of FFP amortization, with the understanding that he and his advisors may be actively looking for another pay day in 3 years.
Conversely, maybe there’s a “Pep” Release Clause, such that it also kicks in at the end of Pep’s contract or his separation as manager.
These deals are getting ever more complicated, given the ability of players to command so many caveats and riders to their contracts today.
The Bosman ruling and the 12 month/last season “countdown” have dramatically changed the balance of power between the top players and the clubs seeking their labor…and I have no problems with that!
P.S. And cake! LOTS OF CAKE!!!