Erling Haaland

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kane is the best in the premier anyone else we will not now how he will performs we have the facts with Kane..

What do Aybameyang, Vardy, Salah and Sterling have in common?

All have outscored Kane in 2 of the last 3 seasons. A few of them had shockers this last season btw.

He is among the best. You are right though, you'd know what you are getting. Personally, I'd happoly go for that unknown.

Liverpool knew what they were getting with premier league proven Andy Carroll. It was the unknown suarez from a weaker league that propelled them up a few levels.
 
I understand that, and yes it would have been absolutely correct in the days when the clubs could tell players what to do.
It was the way of the world but that’s all changed at our level nowadays. The players have savvy agents and only sign good contracts.

At the end of their lease period (so to speak) they can walk away free, the club can’t sell them without their agreement and their savvy agents ensure that they won’t agree to anything unless they can profit handsomely from it.

The only way to extend a players contract is to increase the players salary / bonuses to a point at which the cumulative amount is at least equal, over the extended part of the contract, to the sum that the player‘s agent thinks the player would achieve if he ran down his contract and earned a signing-on bonus and salary elsewhere for that period.

Look at Bale at Real Madrid. £400k a week and the club can’t sell him and he won’t leave because both he and RM fully understand that he earns more where he is than he could earn elsewhere for the period of time in question.
So there’s none of that “give him a 5 year contract, sell him in 3 and make a nice tidy profit - unless, the player (and his agent if he has one) are happy that the transfer is the most profitable path for the player for the time period in question.

I know that’s simplistic, and there are notable exceptions. For instance; Kevin DeBruyne represents himself because he understands that an agent‘s fee is money that the player would receive if he managed his own affairs.
Prior to his last extension, he employed a specialist agency to produce a report that demonstrated his beneficial financial impact for the club.
Armed with the report he told the club what he was worth, he and the club compared their valuations and came to an agreement.
He received the maximum that the club would pay him because he knew his worth, and he pocketed the part of that worth that an agent would have taken.

Sorry about being so long winded, just trying to be clear about why I hold my opinion, but that’s not to say that you need share it.
The point of the forum is the exchange of views and opinions and I appreciate why so many will share your take.
Agree hence why I don't understand why Haaland doesn't sack his greedy pig agent and let his Dad negotiate
 
Give it a fucking rest mate, look at where our money comes from.

The world isn't as black and white as you like to make out.
What the fuck are you on about you dribbling dick?

This louse has made a conscious decision to work for a vile organisation, neither I nor you have any control whatsoever about who owns our football club.
 
If you're child was born with a serious illness, would you do all you can to help them.
Sometimes the greater good is the lesser evil.
Straw man much?

What on earth has the health of my, or any other child got to do with the fact that this odious wretch chooses to work for Murdoch?

Are you suggesting that the only way he can make a living is to write for The Sun? If you are, you're an idiot.
 
What the fuck are you on about you dribbling dick?

This louse has made a conscious decision to work for a vile organisation, neither I nor you have any control whatsoever about who owns our football club.
I presume that you've never once, paid for a Murdoch owned paper (The Sun, The Times or the News of the World for instance) or read any of their contents? And of course never once paid for or watched anything on the Sky platform pre- 2018? Or ever, ever, read Sky News or Sky Sports News online?
 
What do Aybameyang, Vardy, Salah and Sterling have in common?

All have outscored Kane in 2 of the last 3 seasons. A few of them had shockers this last season btw.

He is among the best. You are right though, you'd know what you are getting. Personally, I'd happoly go for that unknown.

Liverpool knew what they were getting with premier league proven Andy Carroll. It was the unknown suarez from a weaker league that propelled them up a few levels.
Andy Carrol wasn't proven in the PL by any standards. He had played less than 50 games before joining them and his best season was a 11 goal season. He had a total of 14 goals in the PL before his move. Kane has 170 or so. The Suarez transfer was a gem though.
 
What do Aybameyang, Vardy, Salah and Sterling have in common?

All have outscored Kane in 2 of the last 3 seasons. A few of them had shockers this last season btw.

He is among the best. You are right though, you'd know what you are getting. Personally, I'd happoly go for that unknown.

Liverpool knew what they were getting with premier league proven Andy Carroll. It was the unknown suarez from a weaker league that propelled them up a few levels.
Here we have more bollocks. Must of got bored of the old stuff. For every bad transfer like Carroll (which was awful as everyone knew from the start) you have a Yorke, Cole, Shearer, Van Persie style signing, all proven in the prem and all smashed it at their next clubs. Stop talking out of your arse. If you don’t want him ok we get it, but fuck off with your nonsense
 
I presume that you've never once, paid for a Murdoch owned paper (The Sun, The Times or the News of the World for instance) or read any of their contents? And of course never once paid for or watched anything on the Sky platform pre- 2018? Or ever, ever, read Sky News or Sky Sports News online?
It's like playing chess with a pigeon, I can see you nodding away but nothing is going in is it?

Can you see, there's a world of difference between making a conscious decision to REPRESENT and GET PAID BY, a Murdoch publication and being at any level, a consumer? I do not subscribe to Sky, I do not read any Murdoch titles and I would stick pins in my eyes before I would knowingly contribute a penny to any Murdoch owned enterprise or platform.
 
It's like playing chess with a pigeon, I can see you nodding away but nothing is going in is it?

Can you see, there's a world of difference between making a conscious decision to REPRESENT and GET PAID BY, a Murdoch publication and being at any level, a consumer? I do not subscribe to Sky, I do not read any Murdoch titles and I would stick pins in my eyes before I would knowingly contribute a penny to any Murdoch owned enterprise or platform.
You resorted to personal abuse because you have a very small penis I'm guessing?
 
You resorted to personal abuse because you have a very small penis I'm guessing?
Oh do fuck off you simpleton. Penis references? You really are a Sun reader aren't you.

As for size, ask yer maw, she's never complained...(am I doing this right?)
 
Here we have more bollocks. Must of got bored of the old stuff. For every bad transfer like Carroll (which was awful as everyone knew from the start) you have a Yorke, Cole, Shearer, Van Persie style signing, all proven in the prem and all smashed it at their next clubs. Stop talking out of your arse. If you don’t want him ok we get it, but fuck off with your nonsense

Likewise. You desperately want him, ok we get it. You talk nonsense to justify it, i'll talk nonsense to argue it, welcome to call it out when you think is balls, like I do too. The point is there, there is no guarantee, you can get hung up on the example, and we could each find good and bad ones. Aye, and Van Persie the 1 and a quarter season wonder signing. Yeah worth spending 120m to hope for that outcome.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top