He has everything and will be the best striker in the world, if he's not already. He'd score for fun at City, I said previously and was shouted and laughed at but he's capable of 60 a season at CityHe has absolutely everything. Tall, physically strong, quick, can create and can finish. I would have thrown everything at him. I think he would have been obtainable this season for about £170m all in. Given that we could easily get 10 years out of him, it would seem much better value than £120m for Kane. The only question for me is the wages he’d demand and whether that would make the overall price prohibitive. Then again, he’d be a commercial magnet. Perhaps not on the same scale as Messi, but certainly on a significantly larger scale than Kane.
:(I think this is why they’ve given Cavani another year. They expect Haaland to come next year and Pogba’s wages to be gone!
Then, they get rid of Martial and a few others, and Bob’s yer uncle.
I’m not sure how his Father could let him go to the club that ended his career, but if it sets him (Alfe) up for life, too, then I guess money talks louder than Keane’s studs to the knee!
His father has history against Keane not the rags, and his son is a pro footballer not a fan boy.I think this is why they’ve given Cavani another year. They expect Haaland to come next year and Pogba’s wages to be gone!
Then, they get rid of Martial and a few others, and Bob’s yer uncle.
I’m not sure how his Father could let him go to the club that ended his career, but if it sets him (Alfe) up for life, too, then I guess money talks louder than Keane’s studs to the knee!
We went for the smarter option.We are willing to spend north of 225m this summer. Then, why couldn't we do a deal for Haaland for 180m or so. ? We only needed Haaland, not Grealish plus Kane.
Only time will tell with that statement.We went for the smarter option.
Maybe with Kane, but Grealish was the right choice.Only time will tell with that statement.
Same applies to both, time will be the judge.Maybe with Kane, but Grealish was the right choice.
Of course, but in terms addressing a need, it is absolutely the right move. Whether it works out or not we'll see.Same applies to both, time will be the judge.
Just watched highlights he set a couple up as well, he’s a proper beast pace to burn and a physical force. His link up play looked great as well. I hope we’ve done/will do what we can to sign him.Two more goals yesterday, the guys a machine. We should be looking at him big time
Sign one player on stupid wages, what will the others think? KDB, Sterling etc will all want parity and rightly so, they have been here long term and won the titles.In a willy waving contest between City Chelsea and the Rags who wins? Because that’s all it will come down to next season. Who can offer the biggest package.
If we were prepared to pay Messi stupid money then I don’t see us being put off by Haaland’s demands one bit.
I agree Haaland will end up at one of the Spanish clubs or the rags because I don't see other clubs having the money or being willing to do business with his agent (ourselves included).I don't know if it's true but this is currently the Rumours in Norway:
- Haaland has an Agreement with Barcelona.
- Real Madrid and Barcelona made a pact. Real Madrid signs Mbappe and Barcelona Haaland so they market them like Ronaldo vs Messi
- Laporta told Pep not to go for Haaland in his Dinner and Pep already knows that Haaland will move to Barcelona.
- Real Madrid and Barcelona will force the English clubs to play in the Super League. Every English club has signed a 18 Pages Document which binds them to League. They can't leave the Super League.
- Chelsea and Manchester City sent Perez a Letter to disband the Super League with JP Morgan but Perez refused. The Super League will be a open League