TueartsCossackSpray
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 619
A little.cameo @ 30sec
And Straight in at number 2……Showaddywaddy
A little.cameo @ 30sec
I agree with you on both counts on the one hand I would want the super clubs to benefit too much from external income or be able to say build a brand new 10 billion stadium and fiddle the losses or just waste money on the other it seems target and against the premise of investment diversification economies of scale and sustainabilityI’m sure it changed recently, but I didn’t pay much notice, have a feeling all projects in the pipeline are ok, future developments may be different, the more interesting part is the PL/UEFA’s new anti City weapon of trying to restrict profit from outside of football activities, even though every decent stadium in Europe holds concerts etc, they’ll probably narrow it down to no external facilities outside of the stadium, so it only applies to us and a few others
City are very keen to recognise, in perpetuity, the unique achievement of 100 points by naming the North Stand ...
THE CENTURION.
It is felt within the club that they failed to market the record breaking achievement effectively enough and that, as a consequence, it fails to get the recognition and respect it richly deserves.
The club believes,rightly imo,that the name will be used by broadcasters, media and supporters in a manner that will perpetuate the achievement, and generate a lasting legacy to the finest team in PL history.
It gets my vote.
This city matters rep didn't recommend calling it the shed end did they?According to one of the city matters reps the club haven’t decided anything on naming the north stand yet.
True....but its liked for all the reasons articulated.According to one of the city matters reps the club haven’t decided anything on naming the north stand yet.