EalingBlue2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Aug 2007
- Messages
- 5,571
Patagonia to a nice Welsh village?The South Sandwich Isles?
Patagonia to a nice Welsh village?The South Sandwich Isles?
The irony is if you really look at much of TTIP is it is the inners it should scare not the outers. The TTIP will systematically wind back regulations , protections etc of the EU, precisely what the out voters wish to do. Whilst there are elements that are where business can take government to court most of TTIP is the freeing of EU "leftie" regulation and is very in line with what out voters want.So put very simply, because I do not fully understand the detail as probably most, if not all posters on here don't.... Does TTIP and TTP mean that the EU and therefore the UK by definition if we vote to remain, will be obliged to cede to US laws or T&C's (call them what you will)?
Very worrying if this is even half true. Talk about giving up sovereignty to the EU, we really would be part of the USofE wouldn't we? That is of course if these stories about TTIP are correct and we remain in, like I said frightening.
Point the way to the back of the line please.
Australia is in the TPP with around a dozen countries and frankly the US has been crystal clear under the recent government that economically the Pacific is the future and that it is key to US foreign policy and trade to pivot from Atlantic to pacific .When you say global capitalism, do you really mean American capitalism?
Do you think the EU will conform lock, stock and barrel to TTIP.
Yes to either or both of the above questions must surely mean we need to get out, and in saying this I take on board you points about opting out will put us outside of agreements or standards.
Are Australia part of TTIP? If not, in your opinion,would they be happy to conform to it?
Thanks... So which is better?Australia is in the TPP with around a dozen countries and frankly the US has been crystal clear under the recent government that economically the Pacific is the future and that it is key to US foreign policy and trade to pivot from Atlantic to pacific .
the TPP and possible of countries like China or Russia joining is precisely why Europe is so desperate to get a deal as TPP is a huge threat to EU (and EEA) access to these big global markets in the TPP and looking to go in to TPP especially in areas of primary production and agriculture etc and most think tanks suggest that this Pacific pivot and the TPP will have a major negative impact on European trade.
These things should be strong arguments for the inners as to leave a trading group just as others join together and try to exclude countries from markets could mean that a Brexit UK would be suffering the US looking away and US Pacific markets locking out UK business at exactly the time the UK could be choosing to lock itself out of others.
With most of Asia looking to TPP and Europe looking to TTIP, China locking down Africa etc who are Britains trading allies going to be? To give some perspective if you look at aus exports to China they dwarf the UKs despite the much smaller economy and free trade agreements are being locked into the growing economies of the world that the EU is struggling with let alone a Britain at the back of the queue
I can't remember the dozen who have signed TPP but I think it's Japan, aus, nz, us, Canada, chile, Peru? Singapore , Malaysia , Vietnam, Mexico and 1 other and aus has signed other deals with Korea and China (as has nz) and they are looking to come in as are Thailand and Indonesia and some other fast growing economies .
Oh, another climate change apologist. The world is a beautiful place. It's our responsibility to save it. Your response is an attempt at patronisation for reasons unknown. It is you that is spouting 'emotional twaddle'.I think there are a lot of dreadlocked sandal wearing dreamers (I blame John Lennon) that believe in romantic environmental rubbish. There was a scare story that the EU were about to ban glyphosate and and ALL the brown bread and lentil eaters came out with a lot of emotional tosh about the bees being threatened by Monsanto and pesticides being introduced by people that had no concern for the environment. You go on any gardening forum and mention pesticides or herbicides and out they all come like a swarm of locusts with the idea that they are all being poisoned by big business. It's stuff like that that makes me fucking angry and if it means that some chemical companies can sue any government that wishes to take us back to the 'good old days' of Laurie Lee's 'Cider with Rosie' then I'm all for TTIP being the conduit to do it. Governments won't ban herbicides or pesticides of course because our present levels of food production rely on farmers being able to use all the technology they can to maintain output. But what the argument does illustrate is that there are a lot of witch like thinkers out there that would happily see us back in the days of horse drawn ploughs and who would like to turn the clock back. They also have a vote and make decisions on emotional twaddle. Lack of an educated electorate is where democracy fails us all.
I'd vote in on that issue alone but there are other issues I'd vote out on so I'm on the fence at the moment but I believe it's all pretty futile hoping for an out vote. The British Ex Pats abroad, mostly in Spain, will be voting us out as will the Scots. Then there is the proposed BBC debate at Wembley where the Government will roll out all the big hitters and will swamp the debate with scare stories. And if Dimbleby gets involved you can more or less gaurantee it will become a BBC exercise in propaganda.
Your children and grand children will be looking back nostalgically at Uncle Sam, the chances are by the time of your grandchildren the US will be lucky to be the third biggest world economy and certainly it won't be in a real sense . Your grandchildren will be growing up in a world dominated by Asia and US capitalism will be a nostalgic dream for them. Throughout human history with a blip from the industrial revolution Asia has dominated and it will again soon.Thanks... So which is better?
To conform to American culture, standards and globalisation and allow their Businesses and government to ride rough shod over us and tell us what we can and cannot produce and sell and to whom. Or to be ourselves? Because despite our self deprecating yet greed culture, we haven't done too badly for a relatively small nation.
Quite frankly I don't want my children and grand children to be growing up in the shadow of Uncle Sam. I enjoy the fact that I have the right to express this opinion and would prefer that at a political and trading level we remain in charge of our own destiny as much as we can!