European Super League | ECJ rule that UEFA and FIFA acted unlawfully in blocking Super League (p 29)

Jam Tomorrow said:
with all this faux outrage at a proposed ESL it's worth remembering the greed and power grab by the so called Big 5 who led the break away from the Football League after 100 years. They wanted more for them and less for everyone else, the EFL and domestic cups became Cinderella comps with all the focus and money on the EPL. The EPL now want rid of anyone who can challenge the status quo and have damaged our club immeasurably. Well f em, i don't care one way or another about the ESL but anything that reins in the red shirt cartel is fine by me.
Click to expand...
The ESL would be run by and for the European royalty clubs. Utd, bayern, RM etc. You would want City to be part of that cartel? I didn't understand.
 
Brendan110_0 said:
The super league won't get off the ground, it was meant as a replacement of the UEFA competitions not PL. UK Gov will just ban clubs from football operations in the UK if they tried quitting the PL for ESL.
Click to expand...

The Government would face a restriction of trade case under this scenario. Breakaways in many sports have happened and no one has successfully stopped them. Football is prime for a breakaway partly because a few big clubs have gotten too big for their boots and the regulatory body is incompetent and corrupt!
 
red 2 hats said:
Interesting, does FFP not restrict European competion laws?
Click to expand...

It always has but nobody would challenge it. The whole point of it was supposed to be to protect clubs from going bust but we all know that was a smokescreen. It was brought in to protect the cartel. We made it just before they pulled up the drawbridge but by fuck they've been on our case ever since!
 
Gordyola said:
The ESL was the clubs responding to UEFA / FIFA being a money making leech on them. UEFA / FIFA control their competitions to the extent that a stadium cant have a sponsor's name as it might conflict with their partners. UEFA are more than a controlling body they are a competitor to the clubs for sponsors. IIRC FIFA were backing the ESL as they are effectively rivals to UEFA hence the new world club championship, they want more income and are envious of UEFA and their UCL cash cow. The issue that I think fans had with ESL was, it being a closed competition and the effect on the PL, the envy of all the other major leagues. The ESL 6 weren't looking to leave the EPL, they wanted their cake and eat it, the proposed format would have affected the EPL making it a somewhat devalued competition secondary for the 6.
The ESL will now return in a modified concept, they will look at what the majority of fans were against hoping it will get less opposition, remember the PL6 didn't officially leave. UEFA modified the UCL in response to the ESL, with the new concept to be introduced next season, will it be enough? I somewhat doubt it
Click to expand...
Great post. The current status quo is untenable. The way we have been treated by UEFA and the PL shows how corrupt it has been. You can’t have a situation where a commercial rival (which is what the PL and EUFA are) are also a regulator.
The clubs own the product so the clubs must manage their own broadcast rights. There is no reason why any new arrangement should not boost the clubs lower than the pyramid. They could get a bigger share of a much larger pot. Media operators, like SKY, will attack any new proposals because they will be put out of business.
 
Gorton_Tubster said:
The ESL would be run by and for the European royalty clubs. Utd, bayern, RM etc. You would want City to be part of that cartel? I didn't understand.
Click to expand...
City absolutely do want to be part of it, but not as a second-class citizen. Soriano has been planning for City to be part of a Super League for quite some time.
 
A non-starter in the current market.

Europe want to close the gap on the Premier League but probably need the Premier League clubs to do so. I don't think Germany or England will join and that's enough to kill it.

Even if its just to replace the Champions League, it seems a bit pointless. Plus Barcelona v City will get boring when it's being played 6 times a season.

Eventually the Super League will become flawed as well, as with any league there will become a dominant 3 or 4 teams and the rest will just make up the numbers.
 
Yup an awful lot of utd and lfc fans are fed up with the perceived injustice of City winning all the time and they want out.
I think the fans will decide ultimately. Lfc/utd American owners will be listening to their fan opinions since that's what stopped it last time.

All eyes on the government and see if they can prevent our (red) clubs leaving, but id expect a Brexit style campaign of misinformation over the next few years.

I am so glad I got to watch MY club achieve what we have before football eats itself.
 
the hilarity about this is that there is no true outrage amongst the football clubs about what is happening particularly the red shirts, they are angry that someone is doing what they do better than them thats all. this is exactly the same as the pga thing, they are angry that someone might take away their toys and their ability to fleece people and make money and that is all, there is zero altruism in their outrage.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
City absolutely do want to be part of it, but not as a second-class citizen. Soriano has been planning for City to be part of a Super League for quite some time.
Click to expand...
And why the fuck wouldn't we be when we are constantly under attack from the PL and UEFA to the point where they are challenging our very existence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.