European super league

[jrb]

City withdrew first.
Chelsea announced they were pulling out first but City were the first to actually do it.

Fair enough.

But it was still a shit decision by Sheikh Mansour, Khaldoon, Soriano , etc to join the Super Cartel League in the 1st place, alongside the PL Red shirt clubs that are still trying to destroy us.(115)

Saying that, the fan protests would have been epic. Not go mention the amount of empty seats in the Etihad for the Super League matches.

 

[Northerndave]

City withdrew first.
Chelsea announced they were pulling out first but City were the first to actually do it.

this is correct sir

We've all done it, just leaving it in a little bit longer than announced ....

 

[levets]

Chelsea announced they were withdrawing first. City followed.

Also that looks a very formal table, and not made up on the spot. They did a table with twitter links, yeah right.

Chelsea announced they were considering withdrawal, however the were preparing for a game that evening so delayed official notification until after the game. In the meantime City officially withdrew in the afternoon. So whilst Chelsea were the first to suggest they were going to withdraw, City went ahead and were the first to officially withdraw.

 

[Corky]

this is correct sir

City claimed but they claimed that 30 mins after Chelsea so couldn't have done formally. Very convenient.

The Kalhdoon end of season video confirmed he couldn't piss straight "taking full responsibility" a month or so after Soriano was made to apologise taking the blame the month before.

I know City fans cling on to "we left first" but we were lied to about the whole thing and published a Joel Glazer statement on our website, and yet lap up any propaganda to feel better.

​

 

[jrb]

FFS, make your minds up! Lol! :-)

 

[Corky]

Chelsea announced they were considering withdrawal, however the were preparing for a game that evening so delayed official notification until after the game. In the meantime City officially withdrew in the afternoon. So whilst Chelsea were the first to suggest they were going to withdraw, City went ahead and were the first to officially withdraw.

No evidence apart from some PR spin, and when it was put to the Chairman he didn't confirm or deny that.

It made some City fans feels better.

 

[urban genie]

Makes no odds we joined it, be it because we didn't want to miss out or we genuinely were for it, either way we did the indefensible and got into bed with these cunts.

who got out first once the shit hit the fan matters not, we should have said no from the off

 

[Fat Chance]

There is big differnce between ' youll be playing ipswich' and then seeing thier intentions...dropping that firm right in it...got a sense humour that shieky.

 

[Fat Chance]

Ive seen footage of a suit at the time confirming City were first out...may have been the recent big mouth from UEFA...and remember him not being over favourity cause we'd blew the plans to bits.

 

[Newman Noggs]

No evidence apart from some PR spin, and when it was put to the Chairman he didn't confirm or deny that.

It made some City fans feels better.

You believe what you want to believe if it keeps you angry but I tend to believe that huge fan of the club, Florentino Perez;

"Although he had said he would not name the club, when he was asked if it was Manchester City Pérez said: “The one from Manchester saw the campaign saying this will kill the leagues, that it won’t allow [sporting] merit, that it was the end of football. There are people who have privileges and don’t want to lose them, even if it ruins football. When the English called me [on Tuesday], we met to see what we could do. They tried, but said: ‘Look, we’re not going to do this.’”