halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,430
Yeah, it's crazy and illogical isn't it?
When I was a student 50 years ago I did an elective in Philosophy and one of the things we were taught was the 'unity of opposites', which suggested that paradoxes like the one you describe have, at least, some value in that such contradicting positions can work together to enable 'critical thinking'.
Not that I see much evidence of 'critical thinking' among the tribal barmpots who infest the tv/print/social media!
It's taken them ages to wake up to what we've all been saying on here for the past decade about the likely impacts of FFP as applied by UEFA and the PL.. serves the tribal f**kers right.. and as the old saying goes, prophets are always without honour in their own land!
I can't help wondering if the PL FFP should just be scrapped, so clubs can find a rich owner and develop themselves into a competing position, but if they want a share of the UEFA (and now FIFA) windfall, they have to meet UEFA FFP. That would balance the opportunity for clubs currently lower down the pecking order to enter the top competitions with the need to stop the clubs in those competitions from staying ahead of the others. If that makes any sense.
I suppose some sort of debt control would still be required to safeguard "community" assets, especially in the lower leagues. Or some stronger sanctions against reckless owners. Possibly.