Well I have to tread carefully as I'm on a City forum and there seems to be a lot of sensitivity towards Foden on here and his role with England. Your ratings you collated are from the one game he was good (1st half in particular) vs the Dutch.I think you can. Foden works hard. Bellingham works hard for himself.
Foden receives the ball and thinks what is the best pass for the team. Bellingham spends the first split second thinking if he can do something amazing. Then he has to make up for that lost moment.
We need both on top form for the team tomorrow. Foden just do what he HAS been doing. Bellingham to play for the team and not himself. Pass the pass, stop moaning, mark his bloody man on corners!
Track record is only measured in goals? Think you need to see football more in depth.
Foden could have a worldy. The headlines will make Bellingham the star. (Only in this country though).
View attachment 125207
Both Foden and Bellingham are outstanding players. Both haven't been playing at the level they do for their clubs. Bellingham seems knackered, Foden I don't think it's as much a case of being played out of position, but more like the whole attacking third doesn't seem to have a good plan in place, players drop deep and you end up with Foden, Bellingham and Kane basically occupying the same space. Which is odd as Bellingham is a fantastic box to box midfielder who bursts late into the penalty area (a modern day Lampard) whereas Foden is a more creative player who creates space but needs to be given the ball.
But I don't think one is necessarily 'better' than the other as they do different things. Both have been under par this tournament (Foden's 1st half vs the Dutch being the exception) and I'd add Declan Rice, Harry Kane and Kyle Walker to that list as well. Of the starting XI Guehi and Mainoo have been good, Saka, Stones and Pickford have been okay.
Luckily none of that matters as we are in the final regardless and if those players turn it on we have a decent chance.