No no no!
Stick to your strengths is what I say. I can start an argument in an empty room and craft the odd half decent letter, but websites, blogs etc etc is not my thing.
I can take this forward in its current guise as I set out originally and am more than happy to do so - it should work well as far as it goes - but if the consensus is that it needs a different way then it's probably beyond me technically - I have never run a website; I know how to turn the computer on and off each day and that's about it.
Plenty of suggestions have been made about future direction of the campaign and as I think I might have said before I'm happy to go with the consensus. But in purely practical terms there's some people (probably most people) on here far better at seeing through some of the ideas mentioned; I don't even understand a few of them!. So seriously, we need to decide as a group how this is to be done - in the absence of anything firm we can carry on as I outlined earlier, but if there's a better way of doing things out there that we can all agree on let's do it.
