FA Watch

[Montgomery Burns]

Sorry if my post earlier sounded like a big plug for the FSF, it's just the idea of unionising appeals to my sense of social equality, and this is an archetype example of where unionising can help make a small noise far bigger. I do think the presentation of the idea to football fans in general will carry more weight, and get more support, if it's issued by an independent party as opposed to people off a City message board. We've already had the examples of Skrtel on Jo and Bosingwa on Benayoun as examples within this thread, so we can demonstrate the validity of our point to other sets of fans.

Not a problem mate.

Talking of bad tackles how about Martin Buchan on Colin Bell? It's not even 34 years ago yet, which as any football fan will tell you is only yesterday! Remember Buchan didn't get a card - what was in the ref's report? Can this be taken further?

And even more recently, David Pleat's provocative celebrations in 1983.

And for the older reader, Herbert Chapman's two footed lunge on George Heslop back in February 1936?

Something must be done I tell you.

Rambles on and on in incoherent fashion .................

 

[bizzbo]

interesting thread. there is mileage in this, but as has been pointed out, the way forward is to highlight the lack of transparency, the way they prejudice cases by commenting in the media prior to the hearing, in other words the lack of emphasis on methodical, consistent application of a clear set of regulations. this case has piqued my interest. The FA is an institution that is powerful, has an extremely high public profile, and is extremely well financed (benefitting as they do from an extremely priviledged position, having an absolute monopoly, which puts them in the position to benefit financially from the hard work and popularity of the individual clubs and players, and the dedication and generosity of the fans). As such we should expect the highest standards of professionalism and transparency from them.

So the 'angles of attack' should be transparency and consistency. Prestwich Blue has identified the correct approach. Who makes the rules, how are they applied? What potential conflicts of interest arise? Why is this not completely transparent? Why are disciplinary matters not handled completely independantly of the FA's other business? What is the relationship between the the people who make and decide how the rules are applied off the pitch, and the referees?

very tired, so I will have another think about this and do some reading over the next few days.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/Disciplinary/NewsAndFeatures/2009/The_FA_Discipline_Handbook.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/Disciplinary ... dbook.aspx</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/RulesandRegulations/~/media/Files/PDF/TheFA/RulesoftheAssociation0809.ashx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/RulesandRegu ... n0809.ashx</a>

 

[pee dubyas crayons]

<a class="postlink" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/man_utd/7784101.stm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 784101.stm</a>

FA decides against Ronaldo action

Man Utd's Cristiano Ronaldo will escape FA punishment
Manchester United's Cristiano Ronaldo will not face disciplinary action after appearing to kick out at Spurs defender Michael Dawson at White Hart Lane.

The Football Association contacted referee Mike Dean, who took no action during Saturday's goalless draw.

An FA spokesman said: "Having reviewed footage, he has confirmed he would not have sent the player off for violent conduct had he seen it.

"On that basis, no further action will be taken."

 

[pee dubyas crayons]

<a class="postlink" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/man_utd/7693417.stm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 693417.stm</a>

Rooney to escape FA investigation

Rooney was yellow carded against his former club at Goodison Park
Manchester United striker Wayne Rooney will not be charged by the Football Association for kissing his club's badge during the 1-1 draw at Everton.

The 23-year-old England star made his gesture, which could have been regarded as inflammatory, after earning a yellow card for a tackle on Mikel Arteta.

Rooney was taken off shortly after the incident, with boss Sir Alex Ferguson saying it was for his own good.

The FA has confirmed it will not be taking any further action.

After the match, Ferguson accused referee Alan Wiley of failing to protect his players.

 

[kippaxblue76]

Sticky please mods.

 

[pee dubyas crayons]

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-399291/Rooney-escape-FA-ban.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... A-ban.html</a>

Rooney will escape FA banBy JOE BERNSTEIN, Mail on Sunday
Last updated at 09:57 07 August 2006

Comments (11) Add to My Stories
Wayne Rooney will escape a Premiership ban, even though his sending-off for use of the elbow against Porto in Friday's friendly is described as 'violent conduct' in the referee's report being sent to the Dutch FA this week.
Their English counterparts will have the final say on whether Rooney is hit with a three-match suspension and are keen to spare the 20-year-old following a turbulent summer.
Privately, they feel the fourth red card of the striker's career was harsh and fear an unwarranted suspension could threaten the new cordial relations between Old Trafford and Soho Square following Steve McClaren's appointment as England manager.
Rooney is already banned for England's first two Euro 2008 qualifiers following his dismissal against Portugal in the World Cup.
The FA regard the incident during Manchester United's game on Friday as accidental. However, their wish to take a lenient line will be criticised in some quarters as special treatment.


Read more: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-399291/Rooney-escape-FA-ban.html#ixzz0RRsmqd8J" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... z0RRsmqd8J</a>

 

[pee dubyas crayons]

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11095_5091029,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 29,00.html</a>

The Football Association has confirmed Manchester United striker Wayne Rooney will not face any further disciplinary action following his red card at Fulham on Saturday.

Rooney was sent off for two bookable offences during his side's 2-0 defeat and although he exchanged words with referee Phil Dowd after being shown red, the official has confirmed he was not sworn at by the player.

The FA will write to Rooney, however, to issue him with a formal warning about his conduct after he punched the corner flag while leaving the pitch.

An FA spokesman said: "We have clarified with Phil Dowd that there was no abuse from the player after he was dismissed.

"In relation to the incident when he punched the corner flag, the referee did not see that and we have written to Wayne Rooney reminding him of his responsibilities."

It means Rooney will only be suspended for one game, the Premier League visit of Aston Villa to Old Trafford on 5th April.

 

[pee dubyas crayons]

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/sports/rooney-says-he-wont-be-tamed_100135810.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/spo ... 35810.html</a>

London, Dec 28 (ANI): Manchester United ace Wayne Rooney has refused to be tamed even if it means upsetting the football authorities.

The Manchester United striker intends to carry on playing with the same passion, energy, aggression and hunger for success that have been the hallmarks of his career.

The England striker was again in the spotlight for the wrong reasons on Boxing Day, News of the world reported.

Rooneys swipe at Abdoulaye Faye in Fridays 1-0 win incensed the Stoke player, but was missed by referee Chris Foy and the FA will not be taking action.

 

[pee dubyas crayons]

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Mark-Hughes-slams-FA-for-banning-Shaun-Wright-Phillips-article28397.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Ma ... 28397.html</a>

Mark Hughes has rapped the FA for banning Shaun Wright-Phillips for three games while Cristiano Ronaldo escaped.

Manchester City star Wright-Phillips was hit for a retaliatory kick on Stoke's Rory Delap, but United's Ronaldo got off scot-free after clashing with Blackburn's David Dunn.

City boss Hughes said: "We were disappointed Shaun got a ban while similar situations haven't been punished as hard."

 

[Petetheblu]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-399291/Rooney-escape-FA-ban.html

Rooney will escape FA banBy JOE BERNSTEIN, Mail on Sunday
Last updated at 09:57 07 August 2006

Comments (11) Add to My Stories
Wayne Rooney will escape a Premiership ban, even though his sending-off for use of the elbow against Porto in Friday's friendly is described as 'violent conduct' in the referee's report being sent to the Dutch FA this week.
Their English counterparts will have the final say on whether Rooney is hit with a three-match suspension and are keen to spare the 20-year-old following a turbulent summer.
Privately, they feel the fourth red card of the striker's career was harsh and fear an unwarranted suspension could threaten the new cordial relations between Old Trafford and Soho Square following Steve McClaren's appointment as England manager.
Rooney is already banned for England's first two Euro 2008 qualifiers following his dismissal against Portugal in the World Cup.
The FA regard the incident during Manchester United's game on Friday as accidental. However, their wish to take a lenient line will be criticised in some quarters as special treatment.


Read more: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-399291/Rooney-escape-FA-ban.html#ixzz0RRsmqd8J" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... z0RRsmqd8J</a>

It's hardly suprising knowing David Gill (CEO of Mufc) has financial interests in the scum and is also a executive on the board of the FA. This in it's self shoud NOT be allowed and wouldn't be in any other walk of life.