Fairness

[whp.blue]

that as a philosophy might work with 95% inheritance tax, illegal private education so that there was some chance of society achieving some equality.

Also anyone of that philosophy would I suggest not be allowed to use roads, the police or any other infrastructure of the country

Under that policy there would be 100% inheritance tax
Kids didn't earn their parents wealth

 

[whp.blue]

that as a philosophy might work with 95% inheritance tax, illegal private education so that there was some chance of society achieving some equality.

Also anyone of that philosophy would I suggest not be allowed to use roads, the police or any other infrastructure of the country[/

What part of EARN do you not understand?

Clearly a lot more than you with your anarchistic medieval ideas where the poor die at 40 in hovels!

kids cannot earn and if you don't invest in kids then the future is damned!


But then screw children, the disabled or the old if you can't earn go meet your maker

How about using this novel idea

Parents look after their own children if you can't afford kids don't have any

 

[Rascal]

Parents look after their own children if you can't afford kids don't have any

So parents educate there own kids?

Perhaps they can also do rudimentary dental work and health checks on them too. Perhaps make there school uniforms and provide parks for them to play.

The one thing about Libertarianism that always cracks me up is what will they do if there future units of wealth production are ill educated idiots in poor health. Who creates there wealth for them?

 

[EalingBlue2]

that as a philosophy might work with 95% inheritance tax, illegal private education so that there was some chance of society achieving some equality.

Also anyone of that philosophy would I suggest not be allowed to use roads, the police or any other infrastructure of the country[/

What part of EARN do you not understand?

Clearly a lot more than you with your anarchistic medieval ideas where the poor die at 40 in hovels!

kids cannot earn and if you don't invest in kids then the future is damned!


But then screw children, the disabled or the old if you can't earn go meet your maker

How about using this novel idea

Parents look after their own children if you can't afford kids don't have any

That is the ideology that punishes the child for their parents choices which for me is abhorrent. No child should be punished for something which they are merely the result of. It goes back to the worst tenets of extremists like ISIS who hold children responsible for the sins of their parents and Goes against what nearly everyone in the democratic world stands against (Tory or labour) . It is in effect what the Victorians did when in some parts of the country you were lucky if one in two of your kids survived a time thankfully long behind us.

 

[EalingBlue2]

Parents look after their own children if you can't afford kids don't have any

So parents educate there own kids?

Perhaps they can also do rudimentary dental work and health checks on them too. Perhaps make there school uniforms and provide parks for them to play.

The one thing about Libertarianism that always cracks me up is what will they do if there future units of wealth production are ill educated idiots in poor health. Who creates there wealth for them?

That is true but at least it is not hypocritical there are many in the US who claim they are small government libertarians who at the same time as praising Liberty believe they can dictate sexuality, morality, bomb half the world and execute with relative impunity anyone they feel like. At least some of the libertarians like Ron Paul are not evil hypocrites as Well as being a little mad

True libertrianism is anarchy , it is the Wild West before the government made it and is as much an unrealistic pipe dream as pure unadulterated communim is.

 

[whp.blue]

Parents look after their own children if you can't afford kids don't have any

So parents educate there own kids?

Perhaps they can also do rudimentary dental work and health checks on them too. Perhaps make there school uniforms and provide parks for them to play.

The one thing about Libertarianism that always cracks me up is what will they do if there future units of wealth production are ill educated idiots in poor health. Who creates there wealth for them?

I am sure that the term Affording to have children includes paying for them to be educated and health care by whatever means that are in place ie tax and NI contributions or private health care or education, as opposed to knocking out kids to your hearts content without contributing anything to society.

 

[EalingBlue2]

Parents look after their own children if you can't afford kids don't have any

U
So parents educate there own kids?

Perhaps they can also do rudimentary dental work and health checks on them too. Perhaps make there school uniforms and provide parks for them to play.

The one thing about Libertarianism that always cracks me up is what will they do if there future units of wealth production are ill educated idiots in poor health. Who creates there wealth for them?

I am sure that the term Affording to have children includes paying for them to be educated and health care by whatever means that are in place ie tax and NI contributions or private health care or education, as opposed to knocking out kids to your hearts content without contributing anything to society.

But are you saying you would happily punish the children because of their parents decisions? Or would you sterilise the poor and only allow copulation when a financial test had been met. Yes people make poor decisions to have kids when they are not ready for it but it is not the kids fault!

 

[mad4city]

If people were only allowed to have kids if they can afford them, I suspect most of us wouldn't be here.

No man is an island and the whole I'm alright Jack, so fuck you lot at the back, "thinking" that passes itself off as Libertarian ideology is doomed to failure. It's basically nothing more than self-righteousness, selfishness and greed masquerading as an expression of personal freedom.
Of course, there are people taking advantage of the welfare state but to punish those who are struggling but genuinely trying to make a better life for themselves and their families because of them is an utterly bizarre take on the concept of fairness.

 

[malg]

that as a philosophy might work with 95% inheritance tax, illegal private education so that there was some chance of society achieving some equality.

Also anyone of that philosophy would I suggest not be allowed to use roads, the police or any other infrastructure of the country[/

What part of EARN do you not understand?

Clearly a lot more than you with your anarchistic medieval ideas where the poor die at 40 in hovels!

kids cannot earn and if you don't invest in kids then the future is damned!


But then screw children, the disabled or the old if you can't earn go meet your maker

How about using this novel idea

Parents look after their own children if you can't afford kids don't have any

Are you Jeremy Kyle?

 

[EalingBlue2]

Clearly a lot more than you with your anarchistic medieval ideas where the poor die at 40 in hovels!

kids cannot earn and if you don't invest in kids then the future is damned!


But then screw children, the disabled or the old if you can't earn go meet your maker

How about using this novel idea

Parents look after their own children if you can't afford kids don't have any

Are you Jeremy Kyle?

On reflection he has to be on the wind up