FFP facing legal challenge (updated pg 12)

[fbloke]

Re: Wall St Journal Article on FFP

Am I right in saying we still don't know the exact punishments from breaking FFPR

There is no set tariff as far as I am aware.

Which makes you wonder why that is the case.

because it will depend on how you have breached it but, more importantly, who you are

Some would argue that a material breach should be treated the same irrespective of the reasons otherwise you create further grey areas.

 

[squirtyflower]

Re: Wall St Journal Article on FFP

There is no set tariff as far as I am aware.

Which makes you wonder why that is the case.

because it will depend on how you have breached it but, more importantly, who you are

Some would argue that a material breach should be treated the same irrespective of the reasons otherwise you create further grey areas.

i think from the way some clubs have been treated by UEFA in the past then if, for example, Anzi and Milan were to breach in the same way I believe the russians would be a little worse off

 

[fbloke]

Re: Wall St Journal Article on FFP

because it will depend on how you have breached it but, more importantly, who you are

Some would argue that a material breach should be treated the same irrespective of the reasons otherwise you create further grey areas.

i think from the way some clubs have been treated by UEFA in the past then if, for example, Anzi and Milan were to breach in the same way I believe the russians would be a little worse off

Perhaps explains why certain sponsors with club interests are no investing in UEFA competitions?

 

[squirtyflower]

Re: Wall St Journal Article on FFP

Some would argue that a material breach should be treated the same irrespective of the reasons otherwise you create further grey areas.

i think from the way some clubs have been treated by UEFA in the past then if, for example, Anzi and Milan were to breach in the same way I believe the russians would be a little worse off

Perhaps explains why certain sponsors with club interests are no investing in UEFA competitions?

such as?

 

[fbloke]

Re: Wall St Journal Article on FFP

i think from the way some clubs have been treated by UEFA in the past then if, for example, Anzi and Milan were to breach in the same way I believe the russians would be a little worse off

Perhaps explains why certain sponsors with club interests are no investing in UEFA competitions?

such as?

Gazprom and Qatar (in the wider footballing sense) spring to mind.

 

[squirtyflower]

Re: Wall St Journal Article on FFP

Perhaps explains why certain sponsors with club interests are no investing in UEFA competitions?

such as?

Gazprom and Qatar (in the wider footballing sense) spring to mind.

should that have been a 'now'?

also ties in with the two world cups offered out

 

[JoeMercer'sWay]

Re: Wall St Journal Article on FFP

such as?

Gazprom and Qatar (in the wider footballing sense) spring to mind.

should that have been a 'now'?

also ties in with the two world cups offered out

this.

 

[fbloke]

Re: Wall St Journal Article on FFP

such as?

Gazprom and Qatar (in the wider footballing sense) spring to mind.

should that have been a 'now'?

also ties in with the two world cups offered out

Yes it should have been.

 

[squirtyflower]

Re: Wall St Journal Article on FFP

Gazprom and Qatar (in the wider footballing sense) spring to mind.

should that have been a 'now'?

also ties in with the two world cups offered out

Yes it should have been.

of course we are not suggesting that two huge marketing campaigns producing massive profits in UEFA would have even the tiniest impact on how a UEFA member would vote at FIFA?

 

[fbloke]

Re: Wall St Journal Article on FFP

should that have been a 'now'?

also ties in with the two world cups offered out

Yes it should have been.

of course we are not suggesting that two huge marketing campaigns producing massive profits in UEFA would have even the tiniest impact on how a UEFA member would vote at FIFA?

Nor would anyone suggest that the implied loss of such revenues would be a lever used to apply pressure to UEFA.

That would be wrong.