robbieh said:Woke up this morning to the cry of hypocracy from JTU.
I do not think it is hypocracy to want one manager out and another one too stay. This is complete misuse of the word.
You had a go at Blues who are speculating that Mourinho may come in, claiming Mancini "is being undermined at every turn by these posters."robbieh said:As for the post you trawled where I suggested that Mourinho would do much better than Hughes. that is not hypocracy either.
Jim Tolmie's Underpants said:...words..
So; where would you stand on Carlos then?Kippax Street 1880 said:Mancini never played for United, so I'll support him until we start getting hammered every week. Hughes was a tosser, everyone can see Mancini will be great for us if we give him the chance, He has only been in charge for a few months but whenever you see his face or hear his name you instantly think of City. Whenever I heard Hughes' name I could only think of that twat with the perm with the sharp-emblazoned scum top.
jimharri said:So; where would you stand on Carlos then?Kippax Street 1880 said:Mancini never played for United, so I'll support him until we start getting hammered every week. Hughes was a tosser, everyone can see Mancini will be great for us if we give him the chance, He has only been in charge for a few months but whenever you see his face or hear his name you instantly think of City. Whenever I heard Hughes' name I could only think of that twat with the perm with the sharp-emblazoned scum top.
Damocles said:Jim Tolmie's Underpants said:...words..
As I say, I don't think that it's hypocritical of him to ask for calm regarding Mancini after he wanted Hughes out. Hughes had a lot more time and money than Mancini has currently had, and had about the same results.
If he was barracking Hughes after a few months then fine, but after two years, he may have just had a legitimate opinion?
jimharri said:Kippax Street 1880 said:So; where would you stand on Carlos then?
Damocles said:Jim Tolmie's Underpants said:...words..
As I say, I don't think that it's hypocritical of him to ask for calm regarding Mancini after he wanted Hughes out. Hughes had a lot more time and money than Mancini has currently had, and had about the same results.
If he was barracking Hughes after a few months then fine, but after two years, he may have just had a legitimate opinion?