For those who like Mancini

robbieh said:
Woke up this morning to the cry of hypocracy from JTU.

I do not think it is hypocracy to want one manager out and another one too stay. This is complete misuse of the word.

Get real FFS. You said:

"As a Mancini fan I find it deeply disrespectful that he is being undermined at every turn by these posters."

Yet YOU were "disrespectful" to Hughes and 'undermined' him "at every turn" by constantly criticising him - as your quotes prove.

If you think that's not hypocrisy then you need to give your head a wobble.

Seriously!

You did to Hughes exactly what you are accusing other Blues of doing to Mancini - FACT!

robbieh said:
As for the post you trawled where I suggested that Mourinho would do much better than Hughes. that is not hypocracy either.
You had a go at Blues who are speculating that Mourinho may come in, claiming Mancini "is being undermined at every turn by these posters."

Yet you were the one speculating about Mourinho coming in when Hughes was in charge - thus 'undermining' him!

Again - You did to Hughes exactly what you are accusing other Blues of doing to Mancini - FACT!

Yet you claim this isn't hypocrisy?!

Unbelievable!
 
Mancini never played for United, so I'll support him until we start getting hammered every week. Hughes was a tosser, everyone can see Mancini will be great for us if we give him the chance, He has only been in charge for a few months but whenever you see his face or hear his name you instantly think of City. Whenever I heard Hughes' name I could only think of that twat with the perm with the sharp-emblazoned scum top.
 
Jim Tolmie's Underpants said:
...words..

As I say, I don't think that it's hypocritical of him to ask for calm regarding Mancini after he wanted Hughes out. Hughes had a lot more time and money than Mancini has currently had, and had about the same results.

If he was barracking Hughes after a few months then fine, but after two years, he may have just had a legitimate opinion?
 
Kippax Street 1880 said:
Mancini never played for United, so I'll support him until we start getting hammered every week. Hughes was a tosser, everyone can see Mancini will be great for us if we give him the chance, He has only been in charge for a few months but whenever you see his face or hear his name you instantly think of City. Whenever I heard Hughes' name I could only think of that twat with the perm with the sharp-emblazoned scum top.
So; where would you stand on Carlos then?
 
jimharri said:
Kippax Street 1880 said:
Mancini never played for United, so I'll support him until we start getting hammered every week. Hughes was a tosser, everyone can see Mancini will be great for us if we give him the chance, He has only been in charge for a few months but whenever you see his face or hear his name you instantly think of City. Whenever I heard Hughes' name I could only think of that twat with the perm with the sharp-emblazoned scum top.
So; where would you stand on Carlos then?

On his face, obviously
 
Damocles said:
Jim Tolmie's Underpants said:
...words..

As I say, I don't think that it's hypocritical of him to ask for calm regarding Mancini after he wanted Hughes out. Hughes had a lot more time and money than Mancini has currently had, and had about the same results.

If he was barracking Hughes after a few months then fine, but after two years, he may have just had a legitimate opinion?

If im ever up in court...will you represent me please :)
 
Damocles said:
Jim Tolmie's Underpants said:
...words..

As I say, I don't think that it's hypocritical of him to ask for calm regarding Mancini after he wanted Hughes out. Hughes had a lot more time and money than Mancini has currently had, and had about the same results.

If he was barracking Hughes after a few months then fine, but after two years, he may have just had a legitimate opinion?

No - his point was that posts speculating about Mourinho were "undermining" Mancini, when he had been doing exactly the same thing to Hughes.

It's irrelevant whether Hughes had had more time/money - it's still "underming" the manager however long he'd been here for and however much he'd spent.

Therefore, it's blatent hypocrisy.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.