For those who like Mancini

mammutly said:
What would be really 'brilliant' is if blues came together and backed the team like never before...
Click to expand...

mammutly said:
If I was in charge, I would sack Hughes tomorrow and appoint Sven.
Click to expand...

hypocrisy1.jpg
 
robbieh said:
Please can you stop giving oxygen to those who hanker after having Mourinho at City.

As a Mancini fan I find it deeply disrespectful that he is being undermined at every turn by these posters. I'm sure you know who they are.
Click to expand...

robbieh said:
Personally I hope that this happens.

Of all the managers I like him the most. He's funny, has charisma. He can crack a good joke in a language not his own. He has won league title in 3 countries. That shows character. For all Hughes talk, Mourinho has done the walk.

I want City to have won several leagues and a european cup in the next 10 years. With Jose that would be doable.
Click to expand...

robbieh said:
Who of you out there think that City with our current squad would not be title contenders with Mourinho in charge?
Click to expand...

0-hypocrisy.jpg


WHAT A WANKER!
 
robbieh said:
Please can you stop giving oxygen to those who hanker after having Mourinho at City.

Every day it seems that a new post suggests that Jose is a done deal whatever.

As a Mancini fan I find it deeply disrespectful that he is being undermined at every turn by these posters. I'm sure you know who they are.

If we stop replying to them maybe they will just go away and we can enjoy the rest of what promises to be an exciting and maybe historic end to the season for City.
Click to expand...

Realistically if Mouriniho is avaiilable AND we have a CL spot then the owners will go after him and with his record why not - the owners would be fools not too. His track record is second to none
 
Appologies for posting this on two threads but I am sick of people touting Jose as the new messiah, we have a top quality manager


Mourinho is a master showman, but his football is boring, at Chelsea they played a virtual long ball game, launch it up to Drogba.

The Inter fans don’t like Mourinho tactics, that is why the are on this site following Mancini, our football will get better once Mancini can rebalance our squad and get some quality box to box midfielders who have a bit of pace about them.

We have a quality manager who created his own title winning team

We have got something good for once why oh why cant we keep it

Leave the pantomime to someone else for once

Give Mancini a chance and we will start to win things, give Mourinho a chance and he will use us
 
Ballet On Ice said:
Appologies for posting this on two threads but I am sick of people touting Jose as the new messiah, we have a top quality manager


Mourinho is a master showman, but his football is boring, at Chelsea they played a virtual long ball game, launch it up to Drogba.

The Inter fans don’t like Mourinho tactics, that is why the are on this site following Mancini, our football will get better once Mancini can rebalance our squad and get some quality box to box midfielders who have a bit of pace about them.

We have a quality manager who created his own title winning team

We have got something good for once why oh why cant we keep it

Leave the pantomime to someone else for once

Give Mancini a chance and we will start to win things, give Mourinho a chance and he will use us
Click to expand...

I for one have no issue with Mancini but you cant discredit Mouriniho as just a master showman - his record is outstanding and only a very very few managers can match what he has achieved. He has already taken Inter further in the CL than any recent manager and looks like the could get a semi.

Inter fans are mostly happy with Mouriniho

Its a toughie and for what its worth only the special one is likely to dislodge Mancini
 
Woke up this morning to the cry of hypocracy from JTU.

I do not think it is hypocracy to want one manager out and another one too stay. This is complete misuse of the word.

Was it hypocracy to want Ball out and yet give Royle more time. Obviously not.

Hughes was just in my opinion not good enough for the job in hand whereas Mancini quite certainly is.

As for the post you trawled where I suggested that Mourinho would do much better than Hughes. that is not hypocracy either. At that point we had not appointed Mancini. And I rate Mourinho.

I just don't think we need to replace Roberto with him.

Jim Tolmie was one of my favourites. Sadly your skill with the cut and paste is not.
 
squirtyflower said:
PS i do support my team and include the manager
i'll be at all seven games, as i have been at the previous three, having missed the sunderland away, showing my support
however this is a forum with differing views, although it would appear that some views are considered more important than others

and i haven't threatened ripping up my seasonticket (sic) because i'm not keen on viera being brought in either, unlike some did with bellamy
Click to expand...

Oh ey up lads....Another bleeding PART TIME GLORY HUNTING PLASTIC!!!

You need to start giving this club your FULL backing and stop chatting shit on some forum!!!!! You hypocrite!!



























































:)
 
robbieh said:
Woke up this morning to the cry of hypocracy from JTU.

I do not think it is hypocracy to want one manager out and another one too stay. This is complete misuse of the word.
Click to expand...

Get real FFS. You said:

"As a Mancini fan I find it deeply disrespectful that he is being undermined at every turn by these posters."

Yet YOU were "disrespectful" to Hughes and 'undermined' him "at every turn" by constantly criticising him - as your quotes prove.

If you think that's not hypocrisy then you need to give your head a wobble.

Seriously!

You did to Hughes exactly what you are accusing other Blues of doing to Mancini - FACT!

robbieh said:
As for the post you trawled where I suggested that Mourinho would do much better than Hughes. that is not hypocracy either.
Click to expand...
You had a go at Blues who are speculating that Mourinho may come in, claiming Mancini "is being undermined at every turn by these posters."

Yet you were the one speculating about Mourinho coming in when Hughes was in charge - thus 'undermining' him!

Again - You did to Hughes exactly what you are accusing other Blues of doing to Mancini - FACT!

Yet you claim this isn't hypocrisy?!

Unbelievable!
 
Mancini never played for United, so I'll support him until we start getting hammered every week. Hughes was a tosser, everyone can see Mancini will be great for us if we give him the chance, He has only been in charge for a few months but whenever you see his face or hear his name you instantly think of City. Whenever I heard Hughes' name I could only think of that twat with the perm with the sharp-emblazoned scum top.
 
Jim Tolmie's Underpants said:
...words..
Click to expand...

As I say, I don't think that it's hypocritical of him to ask for calm regarding Mancini after he wanted Hughes out. Hughes had a lot more time and money than Mancini has currently had, and had about the same results.

If he was barracking Hughes after a few months then fine, but after two years, he may have just had a legitimate opinion?
 
Kippax Street 1880 said:
Mancini never played for United, so I'll support him until we start getting hammered every week. Hughes was a tosser, everyone can see Mancini will be great for us if we give him the chance, He has only been in charge for a few months but whenever you see his face or hear his name you instantly think of City. Whenever I heard Hughes' name I could only think of that twat with the perm with the sharp-emblazoned scum top.
Click to expand...
So; where would you stand on Carlos then?
 
jimharri said:
Kippax Street 1880 said:
Mancini never played for United, so I'll support him until we start getting hammered every week. Hughes was a tosser, everyone can see Mancini will be great for us if we give him the chance, He has only been in charge for a few months but whenever you see his face or hear his name you instantly think of City. Whenever I heard Hughes' name I could only think of that twat with the perm with the sharp-emblazoned scum top.
Click to expand...
So; where would you stand on Carlos then?
Click to expand...

On his face, obviously
 
Damocles said:
Jim Tolmie's Underpants said:
...words..
Click to expand...

As I say, I don't think that it's hypocritical of him to ask for calm regarding Mancini after he wanted Hughes out. Hughes had a lot more time and money than Mancini has currently had, and had about the same results.

If he was barracking Hughes after a few months then fine, but after two years, he may have just had a legitimate opinion?
Click to expand...

If im ever up in court...will you represent me please :)
 
Damocles said:
Jim Tolmie's Underpants said:
...words..
Click to expand...

As I say, I don't think that it's hypocritical of him to ask for calm regarding Mancini after he wanted Hughes out. Hughes had a lot more time and money than Mancini has currently had, and had about the same results.

If he was barracking Hughes after a few months then fine, but after two years, he may have just had a legitimate opinion?
Click to expand...

No - his point was that posts speculating about Mourinho were "undermining" Mancini, when he had been doing exactly the same thing to Hughes.

It's irrelevant whether Hughes had had more time/money - it's still "underming" the manager however long he'd been here for and however much he'd spent.

Therefore, it's blatent hypocrisy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top