Fulham (H) | PL | Post Match Thread

[Vienna_70]

To be fair there were plenty of references to Wolves being hard done to. It’s all I read the day after on SM.

There’s a big difference between "hard done by" and "let down by VAR".

 

[Protein Junkie]

Probably the best player in the world at appearing to do fuck all.

Mason Mount likes this post.

 

[CambridgeExileBlue]

I didn't know till yesterday that there are no longer any Meat and Potato pies at the Etihad.

In that case not going to make the trek up north for any home games until reinstated.

 

[Ducado]

Dire 1st half much better 2nd Fulham are better than I expected another 3 points and on we go

 

[Impeccable One]

Dire 1st half much better 2nd Fulham are better than I expected another 3 points and on we go

Here you go mate, a few …… & ,,,,,, to use in your next post

 

[kaz7]

Saw the match day thread saying how shit we were, so tuned into the second half to see why we were so bad - looked great to me! Get in, hope Shearer does one about VAR on MOTD!

Change at half time , much better second half , the first half wasnt great tbf

 

[Paladin]

Ultimately, the football world is thankful that you retired from officiating.

Having spent the last week trying to tell us that Casemiro’s goal was offside (when nobody in the real world thought it was), you’ve now moved on to try and suggest Akanji was onside (when pretty much everyone deemed him offside, including Haaland and Lillo!).

What these decisions do is show who is objective and who isn’t when debating.

Pretty much everyone deemed him offside? Michael Oliver didn't, and neither did VAR Tony Harrington. Haaland and Lillo might have their opinions, as do many others, but what are these opinions based on? The evidence of their eyes maybe?

Whenever I engage in debates about referee decisions, my opinions are ALWAYS based on the Laws of the Game. I don't see how I could be more objective than this.

Also, when attempting to ridicule someone about their previous contributions, it is advisable to carry out some basic fact checking.

You said: "Having spent the last week trying to tell us that Casemiro’s goal was offside (when nobody in the real world thought it was), you’ve now moved on to try and suggest Akanji was onside (when pretty much everyone deemed him offside, including Haaland and Lillo!)."

I actually said I thought Casemiro was onside (see below). As for Akanji, nobody is saying he wasn't in an offside position. I maintain that it was correct to not penalised him though.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Pretty much everyone deemed him offside? Michael Oliver didn't, and neither did VAR Tony Harrington. Haaland and Lillo might have their opinions, as do many others, but what are these opinions based on? The evidence of their eyes maybe?

Whenever I engage in debates about referee decisions, my opinions are ALWAYS based on the Laws of the Game. I don't see how I could be more objective than this.

Also, when attempting to ridicule someone about their previous contributions, it is advisable to carry out some basic fact checking.

You said: "Having spent the last week trying to tell us that Casemiro’s goal was offside (when nobody in the real world thought it was), you’ve now moved on to try and suggest Akanji was onside (when pretty much everyone deemed him offside, including Haaland and Lillo!)."

I actually said I thought Casemiro was onside (see below). As for Akanji, nobody is saying he wasn't in an offside position. I maintain that it was correct to not penalised him though.

Yeah, you’ve just confirmed my decision for me. Too da loo.

 

[kaz7]

Maybe because he erected a statue of a peadophile outside their ground when he was in charge.

MJ was found not guilty in a court of law , they knew him better than you or i

 

[Paladin]

Yeah, you’ve just confirmed my decision for me. Too da loo.

You've made a decision? And what have you decided?