Nobody has ever convinced me it would be better than what we have but then I don't normally partake in politics. See you in 5 years and I can read it all again.Yeah even though PR works in countries all over the world you threw in good old America.
An unsurprising result.
But let's see a bigger picture for UK politics - Labour have a huge majority from 34% of a 60% turnout.
I take 2 things from that:
1) first past the post no longer works - it's hardly a ringing endorsement for Labour, whose vote share rose 2%!
2) people just don't trust politics in this country these days
Proportional representation is the only way forward, it provides a better representation of the vote and would likely encourage more to vote as they'd feel it could count for something.
(I voted Conservative in 2019, I voted Green this time around as they were the party telling it like it is)
Don’t think there’s a British owned one left :-(Morgan owned by Investindustrial an Italian Private Equity group - I suspect BMW and Stellantis own all the others - the problem with the flag shaggers is that everything we used to make and made them proud has been sold off ( some more than once ) in the last 20 years or so car makers being a very visible example
Not heard that although I believe Starmer's father is a tool makerHistoric win though i believe :-)
326 gives majority of one! Without Reform it may have been a hung Parliament with Labour having the most seats.Just done a quick calculation on vote share versus seats won, and translated that into how many seats each major party would've won under 'pure' PR (i.e., percentage vote = number of seats).
FPTP
Labour 411
Con 121
Reform 4
LibDem 71
PR
Labour 219
Con 154
Reform 93
LD 79
So under PR you'd maybe have the right-wing of the Tory party collaborating with Reform and the majority Labour government having to rely on the LibDems for support. As we saw in 2010, when the LibDems made a huge mistake in committing to a coalition, that doesn't make for good government.
The other what-if factor was that Reform was second in 99 constituencies. I might do the maths later for individual seats but let's assume that in 75 of those the Reform vote made the difference between the Tories losing and winning, and that 50 of those went to Labour, and 25 to Lib Dems. Assuming negligible Reform support, or no Reform at all, that would have made the final result (bar the 2 missing results):
Labour 326
Con 196
Lib Dem 54
So still a comfortable Labour majority but probably less than the outgoing Tory one.
Boom boom.No it had a leek
Thanks. I only looked at the numbers for the major parties.326 gives majority of one! Without Reform it may have been a hung Parliament with Labour having the most seats.