General Election June 8th

Who will you vote for at the General Election?

  • Conservatives

    Votes: 189 28.8%
  • Labour

    Votes: 366 55.8%
  • Liberal Democrats

    Votes: 37 5.6%
  • SNP

    Votes: 8 1.2%
  • UKIP

    Votes: 23 3.5%
  • Other

    Votes: 33 5.0%

  • Total voters
    656
Status
Not open for further replies.
Growth has been OK, not great. But it's what is fuelling the growth that's the problem. Ideally growth involves companies being more productive both absolutely (by producing more) and relatively (by productivity improvements, as well as consumers having more money in their pockets and spending it rather than saving it. So companies do better, they pass some of that info their workers and they spend it.

But that former part, particularly productivity improvement, hasn't been happening so it's consumer spending that's been driving growth. But unless real wages are increasing (and with inflation getting higher then that's not happening) then that spending will eventually run out of steam. And as I said yesterday, real wages in the UK have fallen overall since 2008 whereas those in many other Western countries have risen once recovery from recession got under way.

Real wages initially fell as a result of austerity, but as the government's actions brought the deficit down, we started to see real wages growth in the +2% range by 2015. It's fallen back since as a result of rising inflation, which must be controlled. Of course the BoE has been reluctant to increase interest rates since they do not wish to surpress growth. It's all a delicate balance isn't it.

My fear is that Corbyn has no clue about the concept of delicate nor balance.
 
This is what the proposed corporation tax changes would achieve (from Full fact):

Claim: "No Labour government has ever left office with unemployment lower than when it started, despite the name of the party."

Fullfact: While the figures we do have back up the claim, some Conservative governments have also left office with higher unemployment


Gotta Love Fauxfacts Headed by Michael Samuel, the tory party donor. Are they still peddling the independent myth?
 
It's the neighbour. He looks shifty. Hang him.

(Good enough?)
Christopher-Jefferies-007.jpg
 
Right this Labour Money Tree. Can someone explain how this money can be obtained without:

1. Companies exporting profits overseas, reducing investment from already criminally low levels, putting their prices up or making major redundancies to increase profitability. Company profitability will decrease 7% as a result of Labour proposals so please tell me how it will not result in a major drop in reported profits, at least 5% inflation (thats a 5% cut in the earning power of your salary) or 5% redundancies, or a combination of all three - say reduced reported profits + 2.5% inflation + 2.5% redundancies.
I seriously doubt the proposed tax rise would raise anything like what Labour hopes as way back in 2011 the rate was 28% and the UK earned £43bn in tax and when the rate was recently 20% and we earned £55bn in corporation tax. For sure things were bad back in 2011 with reduced profitability but at worst the revenue increase Labour are hoping for could be very nearly non-existent. It could even tip the UK into recession.

2. Stealing 2% in the long term from every private pension pot by the transaction tax. 1% from those with less than 10 years to go to retirement. Ok it's not as bad as Gordon Brown's hidden pension heist that reduced my pension pot by about 10% and was the final nail in the coffin of most final salary schemes (after the ludicrous pension fund payment holidays of mid/late 80s) but it is bad.

3. Damaging the City way more than Brexit ever could. Trading would be done in countries that pay less tax. McDonnell's statement on enforcement of this is a complete joke. The only way enforcement could possibly work is if exchange controls are brought in (not possible to EU countries till Brexit completes).

Still looking on the bright side it means a Hard Brexit would be impossible as the Tories are relying on an increase in UK based business profitability as a weapon in negotiations.
 
Last edited:
I'm increasingly beginning to think that Theresa May has had or is close to some sort of breakdown. This would explain why she's being kept away from live appearances.

I think campaign HQ have simply realised that every time she appears, the polls narrow further. Out of sight, out of mind. Not a great advert for strong and stable I readily admit.

Back to our previous discussion, an increased minimum wage, combined with significantly increased government spending puts a lot into the "demand" side of the equation, and unless there is sufficient capacity in the economy to supply then that also would fuel inflation and encourage imports. Both of these would depress the pound further, make exports yet less competitive.

We saw a similar mistake (but caused differently) by Norman Lamont with his tax reforming budget where he slashed the top rate of tax. It pumped a lot of extra spending power into the economy and fueled a period of sustained high inflation. Ultimately eroding real pay much more.
 
Right this Labour Money Tree. Can someone explain how this money can be obtained without:

1. Companies exporting profits overseas, reducing investment from already criminally low levels, putting their prices up or making major redundancies to increase profitability. Company profitability will decrease 7% as a result of Labour proposals so please tell me how it will not result in a major drop in reported profits, at least 5% inflation (thats a 5% cut in the earning power of your salary) or 5% redundancies, or a combination of all three say - reduced reported profits + 2.5% inflation + 2.5% redundancies.
I seriously doubt it would raise anything like what Labour hopes as way back in 2011 the rate was 28% and the UK earned £43bn in tax and when the rate was recently 20% and we earned £55bn in corporation tax. For sure things were bad back in 2011 with reduced profitability but at worst the revenue increase Labour are hoping for could be very nearly non-existent.

2. Stealing 2% in the long term from every private pension pot by the transaction tax. 1% from those with less than 10 years to go to retirement. Ok it's not as bad as Gordon Brown's hidden pension heist that reduced my pension pot by about 10% and was the final nail in the coffin of most final salary schemes (after the ludicrous pension fund payment holidays of mid/late 80s) but it is bad.

3. Damaging the City way more than Brexit ever could. Trading would be done in countries that pay less tax. McDonnell's statement on enforcement of this is a complete joke. The only way enforcement could possibly work is if exchange controls are brought in (not possible to EU countries till Brexit completes).

Still looking on the bright side it means a Hard Brexit would be impossible as the Tories are relying on an increase in UK based business profitability as a weapon in negotiations.
Not a political guy but What newspaper did you just copy and paste this from!
 
Not a political guy but What newspaper did you just copy and paste this from!
Non. I read the Labour Party Manifesto, John McDonnell's comments on how he is going to pay for it, read the Facts sites on Corporation Tax revenues, applied probable scenarios and did the Maths.

BTW I voted Lib Dem 2 weeks ago by postal vote!
 
I agree that UK productivity is very low by western standards (Japan aside). But whereas productivity can be helped by national infrastructure, what it really needs is sustained business investment in r&d, equipment, facilities and skills. You don't improve that by increasing labour costs and taxing businesses more; that would make it worse.

Short term return, it's the Anglo-Saxon model, we're hooked on it.

If business won't invest, incentivise them, if they still won't invest, tax them.
 
Still looking on the bright side it means a Hard Brexit would be impossible as the Tories are relying on an increase in UK based business profitability as a weapon in negotiations.

Brexit might very well not happen imo, were Corbyn to get in. He'd almost certainly need the support of the SDP and the LibDems in order to form a government, and what would there price be? Can you imagine either of those parties willingly pushing ahead with a hard Brexit agenda? No chance.

Labour are anyway committed to trying to get the Uk to remain part of the free market and customs union (a good thing, imo).

But I cannot see how that can be secured without our agreeing to free movement, supremacy of the ECJ and EU laws. This would provide sufficient fuel for those demanding a 2nd referendum and if there were to be one, my suspicion is the Brexit decision would be reversed.
 
And to think you could've wiped your arse with it and helped save the planet!

Planet's doomed anyway, with Trump's annoucement.

So we should bring back coal burning power stations and we could reopen all the coal mines too. I'm surprised Jerry hasn't thought of it. The very idea of 1m miners stiking every fortnight, he'd be licking his lips at the prospect.
 
And to think you could've wiped your arse with it and helped save the planet!
Nah. A donkey wearing a Blue Rosette will get in in my constituency so I'll vote for what I actually believe in. I certainly wouldn't vote Labour with their fairy tale manifesto. All it needs is selling a cow for some beans to be perfect clap trap.
 
The two options are as follows

Once upon a time there was a vast money tree guarded by Barons and the nobility

And

Cruela De Vil treated the peasants to free gruel and asked them to be grateful for it
 
I think campaign HQ have simply realised that every time she appears, the polls narrow further. Out of sight, out of mind. Not a great advert for strong and stable I readily admit.

Back to our previous discussion, an increased minimum wage, combined with significantly increased government spending puts a lot into the "demand" side of the equation, and unless there is sufficient capacity in the economy to supply then that also would fuel inflation and encourage imports. Both of these would depress the pound further, make exports yet less competitive.

We saw a similar mistake (but caused differently) by Norman Lamont with his tax reforming budget where he slashed the top rate of tax. It pumped a lot of extra spending power into the economy and fueled a period of sustained high inflation. Ultimately eroding real pay much more.
Depress the pound further and make exports less competitive, you say? When I studied economics I'd always understood a depreciation in the value of a currency might well lead to reduced imports, increased exports, improved balance of payments, more people staying and holidaying in that country and more overseas visitors appearing, because it's all got relatively cheaper. A good example would be, if we'd bought Silva last May and not this, he would have cost just under £38M not just over £43M.
 
Jeremy Corbyn and Theresa May on Question Time Leaders Debate Special tonight, but Theresa May refuses to be on at the same time as Jeremy Corbyn.

Embarrassingly weak "leader."
 
Jeremy Corbyn and Theresa May on Question Time Leaders Debate Special tonight, but Theresa May refuses to be on at the same time as Jeremy Corbyn.

Embarrassingly weak "leader."

They're taking the piss out of the public. It is completely unacceptable the position they've taken, but unfortunately it is absolutely the best thing for the Tories. She's a car crash waiting to happen and they can ill afford any more mishaps.
 
They're taking the piss out of the public. It is completely unacceptable the position they've taken, but unfortunately it is absolutely the best thing for the Tories. She's a car crash waiting to happen and they can ill afford any more mishaps.

She s lost the plot and needs to pull her finger out as she will end up looking a right chump if she is not careful.

I have not actually heard her say anything positive or meaningful in this campaign. It's just tired old robotic shite.
 
Jeremy Corbyn and Theresa May on Question Time Leaders Debate Special tonight, but Theresa May refuses to be on at the same time as Jeremy Corbyn.

Embarrassingly weak "leader."

Christ on a bike.

Get Bojo in and let's get this thing won.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top