George Floyd murder / Derek Chauvin guilty of murder

Oh the 'shot' officer that had a .9mm as well as Walker that was omitted from the the AG's speech about the non-homicide charges? The speech that omitted the ballistics not matching Walker's gun?

You mean the AG that has until today to release the transcript/ recording of what was said to the Grand Jury as per the complaint from one of the Jurors who claimed they were told different information in order to make their decision??

Nothing systemic about suppression of evidence to skew results about a certain demographic when it suits. Yes, I know Daniel Cameron is Black, wheeled out to make this decision to the world, but he's pretty much ostracised in the community now.

The charge and conviction of Noor highlights an issue when other officers have gotten away with shooting people in the back/ shooting people complying/ choking people in daylight and claiming 'fear for life'. Mostly Black, it seems as we don't really see enough footage from White counterparts to judge.

But let's see what the Breonna Taylor Grand Jury recording reveals, shall we?

Good.

Ballistics was inconclusive but, regardless of whose bullet hit the cop, Walker shot first. No-one shot at Noor.

There's lots of footage of white counterparts, they just don't get picked up by the press
 
Ballistics was inconclusive but, regardless of whose bullet hit the cop, Walker shot first. No-one shot at Noor.

There's lots of footage of white counterparts, they just don't get picked up by the press
And nobody shot at Jeronimo Yanez, but he still shot Philando Castile to death citing 'feared for life' as his defence.

Since Walker didn't actually shoot at an officer, the whole thing is nonsense.

But, yeah, you carry on with your bullshit.
 
And nobody shot at Jeronimo Yanez, but he still shot Philando Castile to death citing 'feared for life' as his defence.

Since Walker didn't actually shoot at an officer, the whole thing is nonsense.

But, yeah, you carry on with your bullshit.
Yanez went to trial (much more quickly than Noor did btw - must be a race thing!)

Walker fired his gun towards police. The person who "startled" Noor didn't. They are not comparable situations, expecting similar outcomes is stupid.
 
Yes, it's comparable for an officer to shoot dead an unarmed man, through his car window to whom he told he had a licence, to a licenced man who fired a warning shot in the air at forced entry.

I mean, just think about the fucking absurdity of your point!
You do know that it's clear to everyone that you're now pivoting away from Officer Noor, who you based your argument on, and towards Officer Yanez, right?

"into the air" isn't what Walker said in the police interview. He said he shot towards the door and down. Even if he shot into the air, or hell in the complete opposite direction, the fact he fired a gun, and was the first to fire, makes things more complicated than both the Noor and Yanez cases.

Nothing absurd about my point.
 
ex - officer Chauvin made $1.25m bail today and was released from jail.
It's pretty obvious from some of their responses on Twitter that a lot of Trump supporters have absolutely no problem with the police murdering black people. It's one thing to come up with all of these bullshit 'nuanced' arguments about how BLM is anti-police, or divisive, or trying to shoehorn a Marxist agenda into American politics, but when it comes down to it, a lot of them are praising the individual police officer we saw murdering someone on camera.
 
It's pretty obvious from some of their responses on Twitter that a lot of Trump supporters have absolutely no problem with the police murdering black people. It's one thing to come up with all of these bullshit 'nuanced' arguments about how BLM is anti-police, or divisive, or trying to shoehorn a Marxist agenda into American politics, but when it comes down to it, a lot of them are praising the individual police officer we saw murdering someone on camera.

it still makes my blood run cold having watched those 9 minutes. Wish I hadn't but it does inform you of the reality and brutality of what is going on.
 
It's pretty obvious from some of their responses on Twitter that a lot of Trump supporters have absolutely no problem with the police murdering black people. It's one thing to come up with all of these bullshit 'nuanced' arguments about how BLM is anti-police, or divisive, or trying to shoehorn a Marxist agenda into American politics, but when it comes down to it, a lot of them are praising the individual police officer we saw murdering someone on camera.
Arguments like these really have to go away with 2020 really.
 
Ah, the classic don't address the issue just address the tone. Maybe that sort of argument in defence of the indefensible will also disappear up its own arse and die sometime soon.
There is nothing to address. You proposed a false argument.

A. You take facts that are true "how BLM is anti-police, or divisive, or trying to shoehorn a Marxist agenda into American politics," e.t.c and call them bullshit nuance argument. In essence trying to undermine the fact they are true.

Then turn around and disparage the character of millions of Americans with no evidence to back it up

1. Black people are not being murdered by police. At least not at a number disproportionate to their level of interactions with the police.

2. In the case where police misconduct has occurred such as in the Floyd case, everyone is appalled by Chauvin.

Hence why generalized pronouncement like yours really needs to go.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.