I'm With Stupid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2013
- Messages
- 20,375
So after 2 albums? They headlined in 1995, the same year that What's the Story came out. And that came out in October, after the festival. SZA has an album out later this year, so literally more experienced that Oasis were when they headlined: two albums, another album coming soon. So well done on disproving your own point.Well the main stage is for the biggest acts. There are other stages to showcase the up and coming artists. Absolute fact is that in previous years you do not get new artists headlining and you are free to prove me wrong.
Note that oasis, arguably the biggest band out of the uk in a generation didn’t headline the main stage until well after definitely maybe and what’s the story were released
Incidentally, the other headliner that year were Pulp, who had released quite a few by that point, but only one that wouldn't be a very tricky pub quiz question. They were headlining because of Different Class, not because of the stuff they released in the late 80s.
It's not a massive surprise that a music festival wants to get the best artists at the time they're releasing their best music, not 10 years later once they've 'proved themselves worthy'. Plenty of headliners get the call after the first big album of their career. Happy Mondays after Pills, Thrills and Bellyaches. Pulp after Different Class. Oasis after Definitely Maybe. Ash in 1996 after their debut album. Travis after The Man Who. The Killers after Hot Fuss. Many of these are their first or second albums. It's just bollocks to claim that new artists don't headline. They have throughout the history of the festival.
And it's also worth mentioning that SZA's first album came out in 2017, so she's not some new act. She's presumably been performing live since before then.
As I said, "I don't like her" is completely legitimate. It just makes me laugh that every year, the Glastonbury thread descends into a bunch of old men moaning about how new music is shit and the headliners aren't worthy of the spot, comparing them to acts that were just as inexperienced when they first headlined.