Grenfell Tower block disaster

[Bill Walker]

Having children in tower blocks should be a thing of the past

Why ?

 

[roj]

That's out of order and a pretty big assumption to make there.

Just because the odd episode of "Can't Pay Take It Away" shows a sub letting case doesn't mean it's the case here at all.

You should be above lazy stereotyping in your "role"

I'd be very surprised if none of those hundred n odd flats were sub let.

 

[bluethrunthru]

That's out of order and a pretty big assumption to make there.

Just because the odd episode of "Can't Pay Take It Away" shows a sub letting case doesn't mean it's the case here at all.

You should be above lazy stereotyping in your "role"

In 2012 it was claimed that over one fifth of all council properties were being illegally sublet according to HJK Assoc who specialise in housing fraud investigation.

 

[Cheadle_hulmeBlue]

I hope the people who have lost everything get a new home/council housing and not just replaced with some flats for millionaires like in the rest of london. I think there is a serious problem with london councils and the people in charge. According to one the residents ( channel 4 news) of the flats the council/people higher up threatened legal action against some of the tower block residents for wanting to upgrade the building and make it meet fire safety standards. the people couldn't afford a lawyer though. that might not be true, but thats what I've been seeing people say/online.

another thing I've heard is that the cladding on the outside of the building was put there to make the building look nicer to the other flats ( richer people). there have been numerous reports of whole estates being forced out in london and then flats or land sold for millions. it seems they want rid of the poor people and arent investing or listening to the people already there.

 

[Dubai Blue]

Anyway i attended a talk on the Dubai fires you alluded to in the thread. I seem to recall that there was some luck involved with the wind direction in it not being as serious as it could have been

I certainly remember the night of the fire at The Torch was extremely windy. And Sulafa Tower is in a bit of a wind tunnel anyway, so there's always a breeze around there. I don't know if the wind helped lessen the impact at all, but both buildings had two fires burning at the same time on different sides because the wind had blown lit cladding over.

The NYE fire at The Address Hotel is perhaps a better comparison as pretty much the whole exterior cladding of that building was on fire (unlike the other two), yet everyone was still able to get out. That's down to the difference in how interiors are designed now and how they were designed in the 1970s, plus the existence of sprinklers, alarms, and multiple fire-safe stairwells.

Combustible cladding shouldn't be used, full-stop. But it seems that the dangers are greatly reduced when it's used on a modern structure with all the above in place. Using it on an old building with none of those fail-safes in place is a recipe for disaster. And it seems plenty of people warned them about this.

 

[Happy Feet]

No doubt corners will have been cut, financial pressure placed on contractors, most likely down to human greed.

 

[pirate]

A report on the BBC last night said that following a government review in 2013, the report produced recommended making it mandatory for existing building that are rented out have to be retrofitted to meet current safety standards, not just new builds as is currently the case. The government did not bring forward legislation to enact this. The opposition parties (BBC report did not make clear whether it was all the opposition parties or just some) added an amendment to another bill to enact this. The amendment was defeated by the government. The argument put forward by the government was that it was too expensive in this time of austerity.

I havent had time to check the sources, but if the fire could in any way have been reduced had more modern safety systems been in place then some serious questions will need to be asked.

 

[yeseye]

Why just children?

What about the elderly? There was a 80 yr old fella who died stuck up on the 20th floor. The poor man should be in a bungalow tending to his flowers, it's all wrong.

 

[FantasyIreland]

I'm sure it's likely there were, but to "families of 12"??

That's unlikely. Quite rightly he was calling on people to not politicise the thread but maybe another agenda that should be left out of this is the lazy stereotyping of so called benefits scroungers as well.

He's basically implying that someone who is potentially still missing or worse is a criminal. That's out of order and in terrible taste. If it was one of us, banned

Dont talk bollocks,Cleavers had stated nothing that isnt a possible reality.

So,stop the shit stirring,especially in regards to your Mod agenda..

 

[Manchester_lalala]

What about the elderly? There was a 80 yr old fella who died stuck up on the 20th floor. The poor man should be in a bungalow tending to his flowers, it's all wrong.

It's a horrible way to go, weather your 6, 21, 40 or 80. These towers are safe if they had fire alarms that people could hear, also if the building wasn't wrapped with flammable material.