Grenfell Tower block disaster

For the final time,leave your little agendas and political bias out of this thread.

Thread bans may otherwise follow,thank you.
 
Raheem's On Fire said:
I'm sure it's likely there were, but to "families of 12"??
Click to expand...
I guess you didn't see the word "may" then ?

Sorry but there was nothing "out of order" with what I posted, of course it's an assumption to say some of the flats were sub let, as are most things related to this tragic event, but its quite likely, as its quite common place in London. You also made an assumption too, assuming I know what "Can't pay take it away" is, as I haven't a clue.

Further, at no point have I mentioned anyone "on benefits", nor "scroungers" either, and nor was I saying that people who are missing are "criminals", in this event the missing wouldn't be the criminals anyway, it would be the person who has sub let their flat. My post is much more sympathising with anyone in that situation, as its quite possible they may never be identified.
 
You know it's not going to be good when your told to write your name on you helmet before you go in! https://t.co/qToYAXa1k8
@crispymick Hi Mick, can we use this image on our site please?
@SunPictureDesk Nope... Not in in your shitrag
Lovely.
 
Manchester_lalala said:
It's a horrible way to go, weather your 6, 21, 40 or 80. These towers are safe if they had fire alarms that people could hear, also if the building wasn't wrapped with flammable material.
Click to expand...
It's a misnomer about the fire alarms communal ones don't work people ignore them or worse vandalise them because they are sick of them going off every time Ethel in flat 21 burns her toast, individual ones would/should be in every flat to warn of smoke in that flat, occupier would've left flat and it's contained.
 
Manchester_lalala said:
It's a horrible way to go, weather your 6, 21, 40 or 80. These towers are safe if they had fire alarms that people could hear, also if the building wasn't wrapped with flammable material.
Click to expand...

If the info is correct then they are little more than accidents waiting to happen where either deliberately or otherwise the cost cutting effects have been triggered by a simple domestic ignition.

Hopefully the terrorists in our midst do not spot the ease with which a whole tower block can be ignited and lives of those in higher floors sacrificed by decisions that have risks attached.
 
cleavers said:
I guess you didn't see the word "may" then ?

Sorry but there was nothing "out of order" with what I posted, of course it's an assumption to say some of the flats were sub let, as are most things related to this tragic event, but its quite likely, as its quite common place in London. You also made an assumption too, assuming I know what "Can't pay take it away" is, as I haven't a clue.

Further, at no point have I mentioned anyone "on benefits", nor "scroungers" either, and nor was I saying that people who are missing are "criminals", in this event the missing wouldn't be the criminals anyway, it would be the person who has sub let their flat. My post is much more sympathising with anyone in that situation, as its quite possible they may never be identified.
Click to expand...

Revisionism is a wonderful thing. Must be great when you've got the tip-ex to go back.

You know what you meant and even if others think it's acceptable it says more about them than me. I'm out now. Feel free to tip-ex out this post as well
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.