Hansen, Lawrensen and Shearer bring shame on the BBC

[franksinatra]

How many times did lawro & hansen slate suarez on motd..

Did they say liverpool & daglish were bang out of order over the events..

Did they fuck!

Former Liverpool defender Alan Hansen said on the BBC's Match of the Day: "The rhetoric from both clubs before the game was restraint. Liverpool said there would be a handshake, so for Suarez to snub Evra is totally unacceptable. Liverpool have given Suarez total support through thick and thin and I think he's let Kenny down, he's let the club down and he's let himself down."

 

[bernabias home shirt]

How many times did lawro & hansen slate suarez on motd..

Did they say liverpool & daglish were bang out of order over the events..

Did they fuck!

Former Liverpool defender Alan Hansen said on the BBC's Match of the Day: "The rhetoric from both clubs before the game was restraint. Liverpool said there would be a handshake, so for Suarez to snub Evra is totally unacceptable. Liverpool have given Suarez total support through thick and thin and I think he's let Kenny down, he's let the club down and he's let himself down."

He refused to be crtical of daglish's handling of it all..

just like phil thompson was,micky quinn etc etc..

 

[franksinatra]

How many times did lawro & hansen slate suarez on motd..

Did they say liverpool & daglish were bang out of order over the events..

Did they fuck!

Former Liverpool defender Alan Hansen said on the BBC's Match of the Day: "The rhetoric from both clubs before the game was restraint. Liverpool said there would be a handshake, so for Suarez to snub Evra is totally unacceptable. Liverpool have given Suarez total support through thick and thin and I think he's let Kenny down, he's let the club down and he's let himself down."

He refused to be crtical of daglish's handling of it all..

just like phil thompson was,micky quinn etc etc..

Thats probably true. But all it proves is a bias towards Liverpool and a lifelong friend like Kenny Dalglish. Surprised you would expect anything else.

Also not sure of the link to allegations of racism towards Mario Balotelli? Which seems to be the main theme of this thread.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

I'm pretty sure this is just a wind up now so not going to post much more,

That was on Page 17 and I reckon you've posted 15 times since saying you're not going to post much more. I notice you've also posted loads on the Tyler/Quinn/Stupendous threads winding people up.

There's only one WUM here and that's you pal.

 

[laserblue]

How many times did lawro & hansen slate suarez on motd..

Did they say liverpool & daglish were bang out of order over the events..

Did they fuck!

Former Liverpool defender Alan Hansen said on the BBC's Match of the Day: "The rhetoric from both clubs before the game was restraint. Liverpool said there would be a handshake, so for Suarez to snub Evra is totally unacceptable. Liverpool have given Suarez total support through thick and thin and I think he's let Kenny down, he's let the club down and he's let himself down."

i don't recall hansen or lawrenson banging on endlessly about suarez being stupid, brainless, an idiot, selfish, unreliable, provocative, a liability or having to score 10 hat tricks to earn hansen's respect. the same goes for the likes of wayne rooney, john terry and andy carroll, the latter a young man two years older than mario who has racked up a criminal record for three assaults including one for beating up a woman and one for glassing a bloke in a club. not even joey barton has come in for such persistent, extreme and unwarranted vilification from these clowns on motd. agenda? don't be silly.

 

[Squelch]

Just as well that John Terry was found 'not guilty', he'll be the ideal replacement for Hansen when he hangs up his boots.

 

[Soulboy]

Nice to see that all the good intentions to show respect to fellow posters after recent events lasted all of three days!

 

[Vincents Tackle]

Or are radicalised City supporters the only people in the country who can spot institutionalised racism?

So many questions, any answers?

They're even more powerful and insightful than that, the city Internet militants. Last year they uncovered that all the referees were paid to make decisions against us, and that the whole of football, from Uefa, down to the FA, Via Sky sports, the newspapers and the BBC, were working in tandem to make sure we didn't win the league.

Im so glad we've got these guys on our side. And what an amazing coincidence that they all support city- the very club suffering all these indignities.

I also find it funny that when you disagree with them, they accuse you of being racist, a journalist spy, or the ultimate insult not a real fan. They cant accept that were just the happy go lucky type's who love every minute of being the champions of England and don't suffer from paranoia. I'll admit that there are times when we do get slated in the media that seems a little uncalled for but there are just as many times when the media and pundits offer plenty of praise on the club. Id be very interested to know what they make of the good stories???

At the end of the day most of us are fans who have no direct involvement in the running of the club, if the BBC have a case to answer then it should be representatives of the club that ask the questions not deluded/paranoid fans. The fact that the club and Mario Balotelli himself haven't done anything tells its own story.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

Or are radicalised City supporters the only people in the country who can spot institutionalised racism?

So many questions, any answers?

They're even more powerful and insightful than that, the city Internet militants. Last year they uncovered that all the referees were paid to make decisions against us, and that the whole of football, from Uefa, down to the FA, Via Sky sports, the newspapers and the BBC, were working in tandem to make sure we didn't win the league.

Im so glad we've got these guys on our side. And what an amazing coincidence that they all support city- the very club suffering all these indignities.

I also find it funny that when you disagree with them, they accuse you of being racist, a journalist spy, or the ultimate insult not a real fan. They cant accept that were just the happy go lucky type's who love every minute of being the champions of England and don't suffer from paranoia. I'll admit that there are times when we do get slated in the media that seems a little uncalled for but there are just as many times when the media and pundits offer plenty of praise on the club. Id be very interested to know what they make of the good stories???

At the end of the day most of us are fans who have no direct involvement in the running of the club, if the BBC have a case to answer then it should be representatives of the club that ask the questions not deluded/paranoid fans. The fact that the club and Mario Balotelli himself haven't done anything tells its own story.

Another poster who can't put forward an intelligent argument but resorts to insults aimed at posters who can.

Us "deluded/paranoid" fans pay the BBC licence fee and are entitled to our say. How do you know the club haven't said anything anyway? I'm willing to bet they have but it's not their style to splash things all over the media.

 

[BrianW]

I'm sure it's just a total coincidence that Mario gets this shit, while such people as Rooney, Giggs, and Carroll don't. Who could possibly think otherwise?