Hansen, Lawrensen and Shearer bring shame on the BBC

[schfc6]

Thick, lazy, unmotivated, temperamental, violent, selfish. I wonder if many other affluent middle aged white Daily Mail reading men in Britain would share these opinions of young black men......Alan Hanson would also consider Mario coloured. This is a fact.
Hopefully Mario will score 10 trebles next season.

 

[Vienna_70]

One thing that has struck me in all this.

Mario gets enough criticism from outside the club without all these attacks from his own fans.

I can't believe Suarez, for example, receives this level of abuse on Rawk or Drogba on Chelsea forums.

But then, maybe the fact that we aren't afraid to air our diverse views is what sets City supporters apart from others.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

Here's what the BBC Editorial Code says;

5.4.32

BBC content must respect human dignity. Intimidation, humiliation, intrusion, aggression and derogatory remarks are all aspects of human behaviour that may be discussed or included in BBC output. Some content can be cruel but unduly intimidatory, humiliating, intrusive, aggressive or derogatory remarks aimed at real people (as opposed to fictional characters or historic figures) must not be celebrated for the purposes of entertainment.

Seems clear enough to me. Saying about someone that "if their brains were petrol they wouldn't have enough to get out of the garage" breaches that.

 

[Soulboy]

Here's what the BBC Editorial Code says;

5.4.32

BBC content must respect human dignity. Intimidation, humiliation, intrusion, aggression and derogatory remarks are all aspects of human behaviour that may be discussed or included in BBC output. Some content can be cruel but unduly intimidatory, humiliating, intrusive, aggressive or derogatory remarks aimed at real people (as opposed to fictional characters or historic figures) must not be celebrated for the purposes of entertainment.

Seems clear enough to me. Saying about someone that "if their brains were petrol they wouldn't have enough to get out of the garage" breaches that.

Nah PB, you're missing the point.

Lawro was being funny.He's famous for that. Being funny.

I have to have my sides stitched every Saturday night after MOTD due to laughing so much at Lawro's incredible quips and witticisms.

It's what the Great British public want. A funny fat bloke on the box Saturday nights. We've not had a decent one since Bernard Manning popped his clogs. Oh, and don't try and get me with "Michael MacIntyre"... nowhere near as funny as Lawro.

 

[Ancient Citizen]

Thick, lazy, unmotivated, temperamental, violent, selfish. I wonder if many other affluent middle aged white Daily Mail reading men in Britain would share these opinions of young black men......Alan Hanson would also consider Mario coloured. This is a fact.
Hopefully Mario will score 10 trebles next season.

I also wonder if many affluent middle aged white Daily Mirror reading men share the same opinions.
Or then again, Guardian, Telegraph, Peoples Friend, Viz and Take a Break readers.
You just never know.

 

[Monkfish]

Here's what the BBC Editorial Code says;

5.4.32

BBC content must respect human dignity. Intimidation, humiliation, intrusion, aggression and derogatory remarks are all aspects of human behaviour that may be discussed or included in BBC output. Some content can be cruel but unduly intimidatory, humiliating, intrusive, aggressive or derogatory remarks aimed at real people (as opposed to fictional characters or historic figures) must not be celebrated for the purposes of entertainment.

Seems clear enough to me. Saying about someone that "if their brains were petrol they wouldn't have enough to get out of the garage" breaches that.

No wonder Total Wipeout and Its a Knockout got taken off air, there must have been dozens of complaints just from offended Bluemooners, how dare Stuart Hall laugh at the Belgiums

Nobody written to the BBC about Mock the Week today? Have I Got News For You ok for you?

There obviously tamer than the wrath of the mighty intellect of wisecracking Lawrenson and his shitty little puns

 

[Didsbury Dave]

Here's what the BBC Editorial Code says;

5.4.32

BBC content must respect human dignity. Intimidation, humiliation, intrusion, aggression and derogatory remarks are all aspects of human behaviour that may be discussed or included in BBC output. Some content can be cruel but unduly intimidatory, humiliating, intrusive, aggressive or derogatory remarks aimed at real people (as opposed to fictional characters or historic figures) must not be celebrated for the purposes of entertainment.

Seems clear enough to me. Saying about someone that "if their brains were petrol they wouldn't have enough to get out of the garage" breaches that.

Let's disregard the fact that it's clearly a joke and make a series of grand assumptions. Let's assume that the half dozen emails sent by kids on here got past the £16K a year lacky who's job it is to knock-up stock responses to these kind of Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells emails. Let's assume that someone actually cared enough to look at this comment seriously and try to assess whether it was a breach of this clause.

Shall I show you the item which the solicitor reprenting Hansen or Lawrenson or whichever smug pundit came out with this comment would present as his only piece of evidence?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mc_riLosaG4[/youtube]

Case closed, without even needing a diagram of a garage or an engine.

Let's be quite clear here. If brains were petrol he'd stick a match inside his own head to have a look how much was in the tank.

 

[City Raider]

Here's what the BBC Editorial Code says;

5.4.32

BBC content must respect human dignity. Intimidation, humiliation, intrusion, aggression and derogatory remarks are all aspects of human behaviour that may be discussed or included in BBC output. Some content can be cruel but unduly intimidatory, humiliating, intrusive, aggressive or derogatory remarks aimed at real people (as opposed to fictional characters or historic figures) must not be celebrated for the purposes of entertainment.

Seems clear enough to me. Saying about someone that "if their brains were petrol they wouldn't have enough to get out of the garage" breaches that.

Let's disregard the fact that it's clearly a joke and make a series of grand assumptions. Let's assume that the half dozen emails sent by kids on here got past the £16K a year lacky who's job it is to knock-up stock responses to these kind of Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells emails. Let's assume that someone actually cared enough to look at this comment seriously and try to assess whether it was a breach of this clause.

Shall I show you the item which the solicitor reprenting Hansen or Lawrenson or whichever smug pundit came out with this comment would present as his only piece of evidence?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mc_riLosaG4[/youtube]

Case closed, without even needing a diagram of a garage or an engine.

Let's be quite clear here. If brains were petrol he'd stick a match inside his own head to have a look how much was in the tank.

his brain seems sufficient enough to cope with 2 languages

 

[squirtyflower]

Here's what the BBC Editorial Code says;

5.4.32

BBC content must respect human dignity. Intimidation, humiliation, intrusion, aggression and derogatory remarks are all aspects of human behaviour that may be discussed or included in BBC output. Some content can be cruel but unduly intimidatory, humiliating, intrusive, aggressive or derogatory remarks aimed at real people (as opposed to fictional characters or historic figures) must not be celebrated for the purposes of entertainment.

Seems clear enough to me. Saying about someone that "if their brains were petrol they wouldn't have enough to get out of the garage" breaches that.

Let's disregard the fact that it's clearly a joke and make a series of grand assumptions. Let's assume that the half dozen emails sent by kids on here got past the £16K a year lacky who's job it is to knock-up stock responses to these kind of Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells emails. Let's assume that someone actually cared enough to look at this comment seriously and try to assess whether it was a breach of this clause.

Shall I show you the item which the solicitor reprenting Hansen or Lawrenson or whichever smug pundit came out with this comment would present as his only piece of evidence?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mc_riLosaG4[/youtube]

Case closed, without even needing a diagram of a garage or an engine.

Let's be quite clear here. If brains were petrol he'd stick a match inside his own head to have a look how much was in the tank.

so in your world if someone makes a bit if a gaff its ok to constantly ridicule them in front of millions of people?
seems fair

no agenda yourself dave?

 

[Damocles]

This "let's get people into trouble because they said something nasty about our player" vibe is a bit shit really.