Fordyboy46
Well-Known Member
160m fuck me, hope that figure is wide of the mark
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
Emile smith rowe is earning £80k per week now. Foden is going to be a very paid young man when his new contract comes around.£400k per week. How must that feel!
Take me 10 years to earn that. Lol
think I’d be looking at my online banking every night :-)
Brewster's millions
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 3,660
Seems a bit excessive for someone with a dodgy ankle, but I’m sure he’d score loads for us.
However, I tend to think that a lot of strikers would score loads for us given the amount of chances we create.
With COVID ongoing and TV deals on the slide, I think that the arse could fall out of the transfer market, at least for a couple of years, so I’m not sure now is the time to spend big on an older, injury prone striker from another club in our league.
However, I tend to think that a lot of strikers would score loads for us given the amount of chances we create.
With COVID ongoing and TV deals on the slide, I think that the arse could fall out of the transfer market, at least for a couple of years, so I’m not sure now is the time to spend big on an older, injury prone striker from another club in our league.
Paulmcfc2703
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 8,933
You didn't mention his performance just his goal return.A penalty against Denmark that he almost fluffed, a brace against Ukraine and one vs Germany?
Not much of a return from 7 games. Drew a blank in 4 of them. I don't think it's a stretch to say he had a poor tournament.
4 in 7 is a decent return although I do appreciate the Haaland fan club would expect him to get 10 in 7
Don Karleone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 22,278
- Team supported
- Vampire Squid FC
I don`t think anyone believes that figure as a straight transfer figure but probably includes salary and bonuses.
160M for the length of the contract with a bit of luck.
decmancity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 12,623
Why does it matter though? if its 10m or 160m. Its not going to impact anything else. We are likely to sign Grealish as well.160m fuck me, hope that figure is wide of the mark
We could come out of this summer with Kane and Grealish for a net spend under 100m, that is good business.
Lavinda Past
Well-Known Member
Given that we don't have an experienced 'back up striker' at the club, I'd like to think that we are already looking for one.Kane was awful at the Euros, it was like he was running with slabs on his feet. He’s never been a player I have watched and thought ‘he’s good’ he’s very average technically and has next to no pace.
Another striker will be wanted in three years time.
The slaughtered lamb
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2014
- Messages
- 4,619
The only bit I’m not believing is the £160m.
Too high for transfer fee alone, too low for fee and wages.
Too high for transfer fee alone, too low for fee and wages.
Perhaps you should try watching Kane instead.Aguero.
I bet he’s rubbing his hands now at the thought of it.Emile smith rowe is earning £80k per week now. Foden is going to be a very paid young man when his new contract comes around.
so much cash around, shame I never seem to come across it lol