Harry Kane

[BLUE THUNDER]

Too injury prone and not right age bracket. No thanks, besides, dealing with Levy would be impossible.
This won't happen

 

[himalayan_blues]

No Harry, thank you.
For similar money Haaland has a significantly brighter, longer future with excellent sell on potential if the PL or City become too small for him!

i dont think it will be of similar money. I think kane will be available for around 120 million max. Yes Levy is stubbern but we have to take in mind that he is the chairman of a selling club. Selling clubs are more often than not stubbern. He sold walker for a reasonable price and he is indepted with kane. I think its Harry kane who decides whether to stay or leave. However Haaland may be 150 million plus with addition of Raiolas demands. Kane is however PL proven but with not so good injury records. Yes he has got quality but Dortmond players have a 50/50 chance of being successful at other clubs.
For me any one with reasonable price will do.

 

[FantasyIreland]

No Haaland and Kane would be an amazing alternative.i'll let the club worry about the logistics of such while i'll enjoy him putting away the multitude of chances we waste.

 

[Paul1970]

Not happen as like haaland too expensive . We will be looking at the £60-£90 million bracket to sign someone .

 

[Deleted member 87819]

i dont think it will be of similar money. I think kane will be available for around 120 million max. Yes Levy is stubbern but we have to take in mind that he is the chairman of a selling club. Selling clubs are more often than not stubbern. He sold walker for a reasonable price and he is indepted with kane. I think its Harry kane who decides whether to stay or leave. However Haaland may be 150 million plus with addition of Raiolas demands. Kane is however PL proven but with not so good injury records. Yes he has got quality but Dortmond players have a 50/50 chance of being successful at other clubs.
For me any one with reasonable price will do.

One of the reasons why Haaland is so expensive is not just because of his quality, but because the global commercial return will be significant. If we sign him, we will be making big money from his name and his presence. The expensive price now won’t look so expensive very soon. The question is, The clubs that can qualify to making that money down the road also need to be able to pay big now. You don’t buy Kane for that reason. He won’t become a major global superstar at this point. That’s why I think the club might consider Haaland, even if at a higher price, a much smarter investment than Kane, who would be cheaper but still pretty costly.

 

[ChicagoBlue]

i dont think it will be of similar money. I think kane will be available for around 120 million max. Yes Levy is stubbern but we have to take in mind that he is the chairman of a selling club. Selling clubs are more often than not stubbern. He sold walker for a reasonable price and he is indepted with kane. I think its Harry kane who decides whether to stay or leave. However Haaland may be 150 million plus with addition of Raiolas demands. Kane is however PL proven but with not so good injury records. Yes he has got quality but Dortmond players have a 50/50 chance of being successful at other clubs.
For me any one with reasonable price will do.

No chance either one goes for those prices.

 

[M12Blue]

One of the reasons why Haaland is so expensive is not just because of his quality, but because the global commercial return will be significant. If we sign him, we will be making big money from his name and his presence. The expensive price now won’t look so expensive very soon. The question is, The clubs that can qualify to making that money down the road also need to be able to pay big now. You don’t buy Kane for that reason. He won’t become a major global superstar at this point. That’s why I think the club might consider Haaland, even if at a higher price, a much smarter investment than Kane, who would be cheaper but still pretty costly.

Foden and haaland battling it out for balloon dor in 5 years?

 

[Deleted member 87819]

Foden and haaland battling it out for balloon dor in 5 years?

Would be amazing haha. One of the years when Pep was managing Barcelona, all three finalists of the Balllon D’Or were from his team...

 

[Marvin]

One of the problems with Kane for me is that for someone his age, the lack of titles is an issue. He may be a winner of certain stats in certain years, but he’s not a Winner. I like players used to winning, especially at that age. And his European record isn’t impressive either.

By the way, the players from Madrid you mentioned all have (still) better physical conditions than Kane. Ronaldo is the ultimate athlete who thinks of his body as a temple, for instance.

Would I prefer Kane over some of the lesser names people throw around like Danny Ings or Andre Silva? 100%. But I have Haaland and Lukaku way ahead of him.

I am shocked that you use SPurs lack of trophies to question Kane's mentality. If anything loyalty to a team is to be commended and not criticised, furthermore one player can not carry a team on its own. You could just as well make these allegations towards Haaland.

You have Lukaku ahead of Kane?!

 

[Deleted member 87819]

I am shocked that you use SPurs lack of trophies to question Kane's mentality. If anything loyalty to a team is to be commended and not criticised, furthermore one player can not carry a team on its own. You could just as well make these allegations towards Haaland.

You have Lukaku ahead of Kane?!

I wasn’t talking about mentality, I was talking about brand. Sure, I guess it’s commendable that he has been loyal to Tottenham, but wanting to leave to win trophies sort of tarnishes that. I wouldn’t have held it against him if he had decided years ago to be ambitious and pursuit a different team with a bigger chance of winning titles, in fact I like ambitious players. And I was pretty clear on the other post that I think the lack of titles is a sort of issue because he’s an older player. Haaland is much younger.
I do prefer Lukaku to Kane, but that is subjective, so if you disagree, it’s fair