mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
How would you have played it?We should walk away from this now!
Too messy & this will mess with Kane’s head.
piss poor we are even in this position so close to start of the season
How would you have played it?We should walk away from this now!
Too messy & this will mess with Kane’s head.
piss poor we are even in this position so close to start of the season
Kane refusing to play is a massive disruption for Spurs and Nuno.
I’m not saying it’s Kane’s fault but city don’t need this at the start of a new season. The agent & club should have sorted a lot of this at the end of last seasonGrow up. No way was this transfer ever going to be easy, and to suggest it’s Kane’s fault is utter bollocks
To me it feels like the latter, and that’s why he’s on strike as his camp/City know the asking price is unreachable. Only my guess. But surely they’ll budge eventually, surely!?? £130m is hardly a derisory fee!When you say "allowed to leave" do you mean Spurs and City have agreed a rough price so they've told him it's going to happen.
Or is it "Sure you can leave if City pay us £175m".
Because there's obviously a big difference.
Not a chance his worth will start to decrease. He needs to sell and he will.I could see Levy just letting Kane rot in the reserves mate, such is the spiteful ness of the man
Once the club realised Kane had no clause in the contract we should of walked.How would you have played it?
When you say "allowed to leave" do you mean Spurs and City have agreed a rough price so they've told him it's going to happen.
Or is it "Sure you can leave if City pay us £175m".
Because there's obviously a big difference.