Harry Kane

I'm Blue said:
The whole saga is a shitshow.
The fee, especially the fee.
Him going on strike cos he can’t honour the contract which he signed and took the bumper pay rise that went along with that.
Was he crying when he got x amount extra in his wage packet each month cos of his contract?
Was he fuck.
£130m+ for a player that isn’t fit (is he ever?) and is about to have no preseason with a new team with totally different tactics and at a pace way beyond what he’s used too.
Might be a couple of months before he even starts to fit the team, if ever.
I’ve got a feeling after all this if he joins us he’ll bust a gut to try impress, run harder, tackle harder and then end up injured.
He ain’t worth the fee and don’t think he’s worth the hassle imo.
Click to expand...
Go support another team
 
I'm Blue said:
The whole saga is a shitshow.
The fee, especially the fee.
Him going on strike cos he can’t honour the contract which he signed and took the bumper pay rise that went along with that.
Was he crying when he got x amount extra in his wage packet each month cos of his contract?
Was he fuck.
£130m+ for a player that isn’t fit (is he ever?) and is about to have no preseason with a new team with totally different tactics and at a pace way beyond what he’s used too.
Might be a couple of months before he even starts to fit the team, if ever.
I’ve got a feeling after all this if he joins us he’ll bust a gut to try impress, run harder, tackle harder and then end up injured.
He ain’t worth the fee and don’t think he’s worth the hassle imo.
Click to expand...
Happy soul, eh?!
 
uwe rosler 28 said:
Spurs won't be getting anything over £100m for kane so they can stop dreaming also non of our players are going to entertain joing them either. Kane has played a blinder for the buying club.
Click to expand...

Your valuation simply does not make any sense.

1. Firstly we know you can afford £160m. You can probably afford £300m
2. You have set the market price high with £100m for the beautiful Jack. Kane is clearly a more valuable player
3. Thirdly despite what many of you are saying, we don't need to sell. Yes, the debt is massive but it is well structured and manageable.
4. Does Kane want to go? Yes, of course. But if he goes on strike until August - so what? In the end he will have to start playing again or he is not in the England squad and he does not get his dream move to United next summer.
5. Three years on his contract means he is still very sellable next year
6. We'll need replacement players - a striker is £60m maybe more now they know we have cash. Plus we hope to buy a few more so we have a good chance of one them becoming a superstar that you can buy in three years (see Bale's money)
7. We want a nice little profit on the deal
8. So £60m for a striker, a few more at £20-40m each and some profit plus the uplift/tax because it is City seems to equal £160m not £100m

One other point that no-one has mentioned is that, maybe, and this is just supposition, the new stadium naming rights could be contingent on Kane staying.
 
I'm Blue said:
The whole saga is a shitshow.
The fee, especially the fee.
Him going on strike cos he can’t honour the contract which he signed and took the bumper pay rise that went along with that.
Was he crying when he got x amount extra in his wage packet each month cos of his contract?
Was he fuck.
£130m+ for a player that isn’t fit (is he ever?) and is about to have no preseason with a new team with totally different tactics and at a pace way beyond what he’s used too.
Might be a couple of months before he even starts to fit the team, if ever.
I’ve got a feeling after all this if he joins us he’ll bust a gut to try impress, run harder, tackle harder and then end up injured.
He ain’t worth the fee and don’t think he’s worth the hassle imo.
Click to expand...
Nobody knows what is in the contract? And also if levy has reneged on a gentleman agreement why should kane honour anything for him??
 
I'm Blue said:
The whole saga is a shitshow.
The fee, especially the fee.
Him going on strike cos he can’t honour the contract which he signed and took the bumper pay rise that went along with that.
Was he crying when he got x amount extra in his wage packet each month cos of his contract?
Was he fuck.
£130m+ for a player that isn’t fit (is he ever?) and is about to have no preseason with a new team with totally different tactics and at a pace way beyond what he’s used too.
Might be a couple of months before he even starts to fit the team, if ever.
I’ve got a feeling after all this if he joins us he’ll bust a gut to try impress, run harder, tackle harder and then end up injured.
He ain’t worth the fee and don’t think he’s worth the hassle imo.
Click to expand...
sadly i have to agree and it needed saying
 
I'm Blue said:
Him going on strike cos he can’t honour the contract which he signed and took the bumper pay rise that went along with that.
Was he crying when he got x amount extra in his wage packet each month cos of his contract?
Click to expand...

It goes both ways. Spurs gave him an improved wage in return for helping them secure their investment.

He's effectively done them a favour instead of running down his contract and signing for another club on much higher wages than the improved ones Spurs offered.

I don't know why I bothered typing that, given that you're clearly entrenched in your own point of view.
 
JPBB said:
Your valuation simply does not make any sense.

1. Firstly we know you can afford £160m. You can probably afford £300m
2. You have set the market price high with £100m for the beautiful Jack. Kane is clearly a more valuable player
3. Thirdly despite what many of you are saying, we don't need to sell. Yes, the debt is massive but it is well structured and manageable.
4. Does Kane want to go? Yes, of course. But if he goes on strike until August - so what? In the end he will have to start playing again or he is not in the England squad and he does not get his dream move to United next summer.
5. Three years on his contract means he is still very sellable next year
6. We'll need replacement players - a striker is £60m maybe more now they know we have cash. Plus we hope to buy a few more so we have a good chance of one them becoming a superstar that you can buy in three years (see Bale's money)
7. We want a nice little profit on the deal
8. So £60m for a striker, a few more at £20-40m each and some profit plus the uplift/tax because it is City seems to equal £160m not £100m

One other point that no-one has mentioned is that, maybe, and this is just supposition, the new stadium naming rights could be contingent on Kane staying.
Click to expand...
Why would he leave one serially unsuccessful club to join another serially unsuccessful club?
He has said he wants to win trophies.
He won’t be staying at Spurs.
He won’t be joining the scum.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.