Best in England and as an out and out striker only Lewa compares and at 34 he’s not an option.Kane is very good but I wouldn't call him the best there is.
Best in England and as an out and out striker only Lewa compares and at 34 he’s not an option.Kane is very good but I wouldn't call him the best there is.
Well I suppose it’s possibleOr give kane 9 and hold the number 10 for Haaland next season
Waste of time, be explained as a slip, and maybe it was, probably was don’t really care. If I supported anyone else I ‘d find it funny.viewerR@sky.uk complaint gone in
We agree. The deal will collapse. Both sides are too far apart.I'm saying that the deal will collapse (I said that earlier today), but more to the old financial lesson that something is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it.
Now we're willing to pay about 120m (I would estimate), next season the maximum that anyone would spend on a 29 year old is 60-70m as I say.
I don't see anyone else beating down the door for Kane other than us, and he certainly isn't worth 120m to you given your aspirations.
It's a dangerous game of chicken that Levy is playing here, because outside of Kane you don't really have any sellable assets capable of funding regeneration, you're not in the Champions League, you're unlikely to finish in the Top 4, and another crowdless / limited crowd season will be the 'coup de grace' for you financially.
Waste of time, be explained as a slip, and maybe it was, probably was don’t really care. If I supported anyone else I ‘d find it funny.
will you fuck off if we dont buy him?We agree. The deal will collapse. Both sides are too far apart.
Of course now there are greater financial threats to Spurs but I am certain that the business plan does not require us to sell Kane or play in the Champions League. Nor do I think we are completely shit. I am sure the new manager is telling Levy we have a better than a puncher's chance of the making the top four.
Tell that to Liverpool when they kept Suarez. Same with Ribéry in Munich or PSG ( Verratti to Barcelona). There‘s more examples. That baldy wants 150+No top club keeps a player who doesn’t want to play for them , so unless Kane says he’s staying then only one outcome .
Completely shit? No.We agree. The deal will collapse. Both sides are too far apart.
Of course now there are greater financial threats to Spurs but I am certain that the business plan does not require us to sell Kane or play in the Champions League. Nor do I think we are completely shit. I am sure the new manager is telling Levy we have a better than a puncher's chance of the making the top four.