blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
All falling into place to make Kane look like the bad guy.
Anyone outside of the Spurs-centric bubble which you inhabit will think you've no grasp on objective reality.Spurs fan in peace.
We are a well run club ofcourse financially. I have seen some post here alluding to Spurs going towards financial oblivion interms of debt. Yes, it does look huge. Covid really did hurt us the most in PL given so much dependent on revenues from stadium. But we will fine...as long as there is no further lockdowns.
Our only issue is, no focus given football side in last 3-4 years. But things are quite optimistic this summer with Fabio Paratici, new DoF, already doing some smart deals and Levy taking a step back from making transfer negotiations.
As for as Kane, fan base is extremely disappointed in how he has gone about things, especially given, fans were on his side till May, even if he was leaving us.
As for as any potential transfer - City set the marker themselves. Having paid Grealish 100m, the minimum fair value expected for Spurs will be 160m. Ball is on city court. If they come up with that valuation, deal will happen.
Still remember being gutted Samaras wasn't fit to play West Ham.There was a time when a cup quarter final was a HUGE deal for us as supporters and a cup win would be unbelievable
I remember being at Maine Road against Ipswich in the QF when Goater must have hit the woodwork about 100 times and we got dumped out.Still remember being gutted Samaras wasn't fit to play West Ham.
Nah we're the Phil Foden should go out on loan team or any variant on Oil/Arabs/sportswashing.If we get Harry will other teams call us the "Harry Kane Team" like Pep did?
Unless he plays like Kelechi did a few seasons back when clean through that nightJust spotted a tweet that Spurs are now expecting Kane to be available to play against us on Sunday. Could this spell the end and mean us starting the season without a striker?!
Guy top left also said “City spent 100 million on Grealish”
no mention of the 40 million we made in sales so it was 60 million net spend. They know this for a fact just constantly pushing their narrative that City spend what they want
they also said City clearly have loads of money. Yea we have loads of money but they know we can’t spend what we want because of restrictions so it’s irrelevant how much we e got. More incorrect narrative pushing.
SSN is the football version of Loose Women
there's your problem mateJust spotted a tweet