Harry Kane

Always amazes me just how many people overlook how phenomenal he actually is. We've got Haaland so don't need him (although I think they'd be a dream together) but that doesn't take away from how genuinely brilliant Kane is.

I'd take him in a heartbeat - one reason being he's fantastic but another couple of reasons to piss off Levy and the Spuds fans who were all smug 2 years ago being short-sighted to the point of not realising they were turning down a monster bid which would only dwindle the closer to the end of his contract he got.
 
Always amazes me just how many people overlook how phenomenal he actually is. We've got Haaland so don't need him (although I think they'd be a dream together) but that doesn't take away from how genuinely brilliant Kane is.

I'd take him in a heartbeat - one reason being he's fantastic but another couple of reasons to piss off Levy and the Spuds fans who were all smug 2 years ago being short-sighted to the point of not realising they were turning down a monster bid which would only dwindle the closer to the end of his contract he got.

Yeah think pep would have him now but that ship has sailed
 
Always amazes me just how many people overlook how phenomenal he actually is. We've got Haaland so don't need him (although I think they'd be a dream together) but that doesn't take away from how genuinely brilliant Kane is.

I'd take him in a heartbeat - one reason being he's fantastic but another couple of reasons to piss off Levy and the Spuds fans who were all smug 2 years ago being short-sighted to the point of not realising they were turning down a monster bid which would only dwindle the closer to the end of his contract he got.
Actually the few Spurs fans I spoke to said they wouldn't mind him going to City. I guess they want to see him win something and break the PL goals record. They more so don't want him to go to the rags. Understandable.
 
Always amazes me just how many people overlook how phenomenal he actually is. We've got Haaland so don't need him (although I think they'd be a dream together) but that doesn't take away from how genuinely brilliant Kane is.

I'd take him in a heartbeat - one reason being he's fantastic but another couple of reasons to piss off Levy and the Spuds fans who were all smug 2 years ago being short-sighted to the point of not realising they were turning down a monster bid which would only dwindle the closer to the end of his contract he got.
Sure, they would be great. Since Harry Kane would play withdrawn, in the number 10 position
 
No is zero sense in us signing Kane. Haaland and Alvarez are 10x times the player he is, he’s got two seasons max left in him.

Haaland is slightly better than Kane. Even this is debatable as Kane influences the game differently. He’s like a mix of KDB and haaland.

Alvarez is currently no where near the level of haaland or kane. Hence why he didn’t feature much last season and only really came into the mix with KDB out injured.
I still highly rate Alvarez though
 
No is zero sense in us signing Kane. Haaland and Alvarez are 10x times the player he is, he’s got two seasons max left in him.
I couldn't disagree more. The only downside of Kane, IMO, is his age. In terms of what he could bring - and system - the poster who has Grealish, Haaland, Foden, KDB, Kane infront of Rodri & Stones has it right.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top