It's his thick brother that needs the tips!Wonder if Kane got any tips of Joe?
It's his thick brother that needs the tips!Wonder if Kane got any tips of Joe?
why worry? They’ll sort themselves with the £100m levy will trouser…….Who is getting the goals for Spuds when Harry goes?
Always amazes me just how many people overlook how phenomenal he actually is. We've got Haaland so don't need him (although I think they'd be a dream together) but that doesn't take away from how genuinely brilliant Kane is.
I'd take him in a heartbeat - one reason being he's fantastic but another couple of reasons to piss off Levy and the Spuds fans who were all smug 2 years ago being short-sighted to the point of not realising they were turning down a monster bid which would only dwindle the closer to the end of his contract he got.
Then you're looking at the likes of Osimhen. Kane would be far down the list.I wouldn't even take him on a free unless we do the daft thing and cash in on Haaland very early.
Actually the few Spurs fans I spoke to said they wouldn't mind him going to City. I guess they want to see him win something and break the PL goals record. They more so don't want him to go to the rags. Understandable.Always amazes me just how many people overlook how phenomenal he actually is. We've got Haaland so don't need him (although I think they'd be a dream together) but that doesn't take away from how genuinely brilliant Kane is.
I'd take him in a heartbeat - one reason being he's fantastic but another couple of reasons to piss off Levy and the Spuds fans who were all smug 2 years ago being short-sighted to the point of not realising they were turning down a monster bid which would only dwindle the closer to the end of his contract he got.
There you go - exactly my point. Looks good eh?!The more I think about this, the more I want it to happen, 125M on the table Levy, deal or no deal!
View attachment 87767
Sure, they would be great. Since Harry Kane would play withdrawn, in the number 10 positionAlways amazes me just how many people overlook how phenomenal he actually is. We've got Haaland so don't need him (although I think they'd be a dream together) but that doesn't take away from how genuinely brilliant Kane is.
I'd take him in a heartbeat - one reason being he's fantastic but another couple of reasons to piss off Levy and the Spuds fans who were all smug 2 years ago being short-sighted to the point of not realising they were turning down a monster bid which would only dwindle the closer to the end of his contract he got.
3 yr old thread so hopefully.Are we too late?
I think we’re the only ones with the vision here mate.Let's make this happen
No is zero sense in us signing Kane. Haaland and Alvarez are 10x times the player he is, he’s got two seasons max left in him.
I couldn't disagree more. The only downside of Kane, IMO, is his age. In terms of what he could bring - and system - the poster who has Grealish, Haaland, Foden, KDB, Kane infront of Rodri & Stones has it right.No is zero sense in us signing Kane. Haaland and Alvarez are 10x times the player he is, he’s got two seasons max left in him.
Are you actually being serious. He's better than Haaland with his all round game. And to say Alverez is better is fecking ridiculousNo is zero sense in us signing Kane. Haaland and Alvarez are 10x times the player he is, he’s got two seasons max left in him.