Manchester1894
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Aug 2007
- Messages
- 6,356
Could it be possible Kane agree's to sign a new deal that has a buyout?
Don't overthink. Levy aren't stupidCould it be possible Kane agree's to sign a new deal that has a buyout?
Only if he wants the rags, as we certainly won’t be back in for him..Could it be possible Kane agree's to sign a new deal that has a buyout?
Because he's a naysayer and I don't like it!It‘s his opinion. Why always those comments when someone doesn‘t go along with all the others?
there's a gamble with any player you sign we need a striker and he's the best available at moment get him signedThere’s a gamble with Kane, not this guarantee some posters like to throw about.
Different game all together over here he’s still in rubes pocketGamble. Is he going to score 30 goals or 40? Or 50? Big differences there.
Do you have link please?
With Charlie Kane as his agent he might put a clause in there that gets Harry a free happy meal.Could it be possible Kane agree's to sign a new deal that has a buyout?
I can only explain it again. My point is that Haaland comes with a lot of risks that people are losing sight of because of his mythos, and Kane comes with a lot of strengths that people are downplaying. I've never suggested that Haaland doesn't have obvious strengths or that Kane doesn't have obvious risks, but a bit of common sense will take you a long way - it goes without saying that Haaland has youth on his side, for instance, or that Kane has dodgy ankles. We're 2000 pages into the thread, you can take that as read. I'm talking about the culture surrounding these players in the fandom; Haaland has become "the new Ronaldo" and Kane has become "old bloke with biscuit ankles". And it's a shame, because Kane's our man.You didn’t say there was no risk with Kane but you didn’t say there was either. you said Haaland was a gamble and then went on to say how perfect Kane was.
I wouldn’t mind but I merely pointed out that taking a gamble signing a player from outside the premier league hasn’t worked out too bad.
I named Sergio and without that gamble you can add David Silva, Kompany, Yaya, Kev and Dinho to that list.
Just some of our greatest players.
All players have risk, Grealish is one too.
Hmm, it's still quite snarky and not entirely accurate, especially re: the ownership model.Why Manchester City Can ‘Quite Easily’ Afford To Sign Jack Grealish And Harry Kane
Even for Manchester City spending around $300 million on two players is a lot of money.www.forbes.com