Daniel Levy is never going to agree to a written buyout clause. It's a non-starter. People keep saying they should have put it in there like it's something that (if you even convince you club to give you one) wouldn't completely change the terms offered to you.
So here's a choice for you. You've just recovered from several big surgeries on your leg. You're 25 years old. Spurs want to offer you a new deal, but they absolutely will not entertain a buy out clause. Pochettino is manager and the club you love are going from strength to strength.
Option 1. Don't sign a new deal, earn £21m over the next 4 years as you run your contract down. Maybe you'll get out with 6 months left like Eriksen, when you'll be 28.
Option 2. Sign the 2 year extension, Guarantee £78m over the next 6 years and assume you'll get bought without a buyout clause like Modric, like Bale, like 90% of players. Otherwise you'll get out at 30. Still plenty of time to pick up half a dozen trophies at the right club.
If anyone on here says they'd turn down £57m on the condition you might be stuck for 2 more years at a club below your level (a club you love anyway), they are liars.
It's a fair point but how much money do people need? He must have ready been a multi millionaire and still on a good wedge on his four year deal. Surgery or not he was and is their main asset. It would be no release clause no deal extension from me regardless of the money. The club would then have three years before they'd start to panic as it entered the last year.
I guess it boils down to your values and what's more important in life. As horrific and sad as it was I used to think that everytime I saw some poor contractor threatened with beheading in the middle East. They knew the risks but the financial rewards were massive. Still not worth the gamble for me.