Very reliable for Madrid news. City would know of this I assume and one of the reasons going all in for Kane
Is it a “gentleman’s agreement”?
Very reliable for Madrid news. City would know of this I assume and one of the reasons going all in for Kane
I'm not sure I'd survive the 80s if I went back, only just got out alive first time roundYes I do like the 70s I was born in 1970 so my teenage years were the 80s I'd go back in a heartbeat.
Haha, yeah. Ever heard a real coup from any of them? They dine off crumbs.Yeah I see the same.logic speaks so much truth than these people who say they are itk. Fed up with hearing "it could be today". Tell us WHEN it is instead of generic bollocks.
What do you mean by official? Yesterday's report was from sources very close to city and they reported it. If you choose to not believe them that's upto you and fair. Official is stupid argument. Unless u have an "official statement" to prove otherwise
Maybe some of it went to grealish rest is not enough to sign kaneIF that was true and we need to sell, what happened to the "special' Messi money?
I would have thought from the clubs point of view signing Kane is far more important than the chance of signing Messi was.
Unless you put allegedly, supposed, rumoured before things you post then there are a select number of elitist members on here that will pull you up on it constantly when in reality things posted on here should (most of the time) be taken with a pinch of salt. You are free to believe whatever you want to believe at the end of the day and not everything mentioned on here has to be factually accurate or only from ITKs. Some people take themselves way too seriously.City never ever issue statement on transfers. You would be naive to believe that. I posted link of reporters (not some reporter but very respected ones) who are believed to be very close to the club. If you expect me to quote a line from city website, I give up. Good day!
Do they have any gentlemen on Madrid's board.Is it a “gentleman’s agreement”?