“If” we pay £100m+ for Kane at least we’ll know where our huge loses come from last season.
We’ve spent it on crack.
Crack CoKane?
“If” we pay £100m+ for Kane at least we’ll know where our huge loses come from last season.
We’ve spent it on crack.
He could be our disability kane!:))If we sign Kane at least we can say we are able.
Who’d Adam and Eve it?If we sign Kane at least we can say we are able.
£110m + £20m in add ons is probably not far off.
Also another thing to factor is that Kane seems desperate to join, I don't get this impression from Haaland. By all accounts this is a factor City value hugely.
£110m if both clubs are serious.What do we all think is a realistic transfer fee for Kane? I can see the club going to £90m absolute maximum. £150m being quoted is just an insane figure, definitely not justifiable.
People need to understand, the financial viability of this transfer will be decided by the professionals running this club. We’re not being run by a bunch of amateurs who are going to get owned by a chancer like Levy.There’s no doubt he’d improve us so the main question is price. At £70m it’s a no brainer. At £170m, no brain.
I’m sure the lukewarm response on here is largely down to the expectation Levy will demand silly money.
Other crucial factors: (a) the likelihood or otherwise of getting Haaland, and (b) what more desperate clubs are willing to spunk up.
Rags are in for danny ings
I don't see City going over £100m for Kane or Haaland.