manimanc
Well-Known Member
I always thought he played alright but I didn't watch spurs much last season.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
I. Feel like you've forgotten how much flak you got for thinking Sanchez was passed it. The vitriol and ridicule that flowed your way was strong. It's only after the fact that many now saw what you pointed out prior.Sanchez was past his best. That was evident and easy to identify because he was a player who was very reliant on his physicality. Kane is 28. He is at his peak but probably for a limited time so the valuation is extreme.
And no Kane isn't like Sanchez. I see no decline. But I don't think he increases our chances as much as you believe.
I think Messi, a healthy Mbappe and Neymar. Would be more than enough to take us on. So will a healthy Bayern and Liverpool.
We lucked out last year, yet Pep screwed it up. If everyone is firing, the road will be far more challenging this year. Kane or no Kane.
Also, I don't think Kane improves us that much. Even a good still in form Kane. His lack of speed is a real problem.
He compliments how we play, but adds little extra to it.
Great Kompany
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Jun 2017
- Messages
- 942
- Team supported
- Manchester City
You should pay them what they want - This particular notion only applies if City has promised Pep Kane and Kane only!
I am still of the belief Kane will sign.
And there is only one scenario where I would consider that the mistake was indeed City's is if the deal doesn't happen because we refused to pay the extra 20 million.
There is no way Kane is a target of City for 15 months and we have just realised we are dealing with Levy.
You don't let 15 months of effort go to waste for some ego battle with Levy.
I am still of the belief Kane will sign.
And there is only one scenario where I would consider that the mistake was indeed City's is if the deal doesn't happen because we refused to pay the extra 20 million.
There is no way Kane is a target of City for 15 months and we have just realised we are dealing with Levy.
You don't let 15 months of effort go to waste for some ego battle with Levy.
BufordUSABlue
Well-Known Member
I believe that Bernie actually said............ "Eu não estou assinando para aquela chuva de merda" and i dont blame him one bit!So to summarise how we got on yesterday in trying to get this deal resolved.
From my understanding and if reports are correct. Jorge Mendes was supposed to come to City with a suitable deal to propose for Bernardos transfer. It hasn’t happened so City set up a meeting with Mendes (Mendes was alleged to have been meeting City and Bernardo his client yesterday). City said we have come up with a solution for your transfer…Spurs will take you as part of our offer for Kane. Bernardo presumably said I’m not signing for that shower of shite or words to that affect. City now have to come up with a different plan for this deal.
Whichever way this saga goes, Bernardo is a key part of our transfer activity.
However, Bernie will be allowed to leave, once we have all our transfer targets in!
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
Whatever the outcome, stick around, don't get pressurised off the board.From the info I got mate, they agreed personal terms with Kane on the same day they did with Grealish.
That’s why I was so giddy and decided to come back online
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 13,310
"Then enjoy the Europa, and the millions retaining the number 10 at Spurs will bring you"Sounds like ‘city up the bid ffs” or i’m playing in europa .
LongsightM13
Well-Known Member
He is likely to improve the output from our pacier options like Raheem and Phil who the false 9 system didn’t always suitI. Feel like you've forgotten how much flak you got for thinking Sanchez was passed it. The vitriol and ridicule that flowed your way was strong. It's only after the fact that many now saw what you pointed out prior.
And no Kane isn't like Sanchez. I see no decline. But I don't think he increases our chances as much as you believe.
I think Messi, a healthy Mbappe and Neymar. Would be more than enough to take us on. So will a healthy Bayern and Liverpool.
We lucked out last year, yet Pep screwed it up. If everyone is firing, the road will be far more challenging this year. Kane or no Kane.
Also, I don't think Kane improves us that much. Even a good still in form Kane. His lack of speed is a real problem.
He compliments how we play, but adds little extra to it.
I’d say city were meeting Mendes in London and not anything to do with Kane like TH saidSo to summarise how we got on yesterday in trying to get this deal resolved.
From my understanding and if reports are correct. Jorge Mendes was supposed to come to City with a suitable deal to propose for Bernardos transfer. It hasn’t happened so City set up a meeting with Mendes (Mendes was alleged to have been meeting City and Bernardo his client yesterday). City said we have come up with a solution for your transfer…Spurs will take you as part of our offer for Kane. Bernardo presumably said I’m not signing for that shower of shite or words to that affect. City now have to come up with a different plan for this deal.
Whichever way this saga goes, Bernardo is a key part of our transfer activity.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
Don't let the wums spoil your joy on here.I’m honestly past caring pal
You got more people backing you than being shit with you.
I love yours and tolmies posts, although I posted I'm getting bored with the saga it doesn't have any bearing on you or other folk with info.
Keep posting mate.