Harry Kane

[p.taker]

They would for 100m

Maybe in Football Manager

 

[Coatigan]

Kane is a 2 year project for a 2 year manager at an over valued price. We would be better having a 4/5 year plan.

Hardly. Sure it is a lot of money for a player in what is his last contract, and might not get the most out of the full 5 years he joins for depending on how he ages and his luck. But hardly only 2 years.

 

[applecentral]

plenty of hungry, desperate flappers on here ;)

Too right. I might even wheel the time machine out again. Somebody will bite.

 

[Coatigan]

If we bend over and give Levy what he wants it will cost us big time in our future dealings.

I agree with you completely than Kane will have to ask for a move, just not sure he has the bottle or will to do that, time will tell.

Agree. For all of Levy's bluster, we have lately built a bit of an image ourselves, of not paying over what we value a player and being ready to walk away when the price isnt right.

 

[inchy14]

Maybe. But Pep and Lewandowski may well be close. Quotes by Pep suggest admiration. Throw in the fact he's still a better player than Kane and there's a whiff of a story.

I’d take him over Kane personally.

 

[waspish]

Kane is a 2 year project for a 2 year manager at an over valued price. We would be better having a 4/5 year plan.

Kane will score at least 20+ premier goals next 4 seasons! it’s the here and now we need a striker so we pay the big £ now get him in and we are good for at least 4 season’s..

 

[Claytop]

View attachment 24258From an ‘ITK’ on the spurs forum :))))))

Thought I’d share. Obvs anything can still happen

Just incase anyone thought this guy had any idea…

 

[urban genie]

Agree. For all of Levy's bluster, we have lately built a bit of an image ourselves, of not paying over what we value a player and being ready to walk away when the price isnt right.

And is the right sensible policy, even though most our there claim we spend what we want, we have alway been professional and financially sound .

Unfortunately we have now be castigated in this mornings press of being tight and Kane transfers delay is all our fault for not paying up whatever levy wants.


One week we spend too much and are ruining football, this week week spend too little amd are ruining football.

The mind does boggle.

 

[BlueBrain]

Just incase anyone thought this guy had any idea…

View attachment 24272
View attachment 24273

Chancer again

 

[blueparrot]

Kane is a 2 year project for a 2 year manager at an over valued price. We would be better having a 4/5 year plan.

Kane is good for 3 or 4 years, and nobody has said Pap is leaving in 2 years either. The club always plan more than 2 years anyway, it’s why we have a DOF.