Harry Kane

[Deleted member 87819]

No.

That coupled with thinking that any player from outside the Premier League won’t work in the Premier League will take us far

 

[KennyG]

We should get over making decisions based on the reactions it would get from our rivals

Or we could sign Wijnaldum on a free, more piss :))

 

[Jokithedruid]

That coupled with thinking that any player from outside the Premier League won’t work in the Premier League will take us far

Meh, let's take the best player i europe (Messi) AND get Kane. We will win every trophy there is AND boil our rival's piss.

 

[balotellishaircut]

i still dont think hes coming here, no matter what the gutter press make up.

 

[the talisman]

I’d have Kane at City in a heartbeat. He’s 27 (28 soon) so has years left. I’d hope we would manage his injuries better than Spurs have, they are a bit of a one man team and are probably more inclined to rush him back.
Also, he’s pretty good from the spot, something we have missed since Yaya.

 

[PhdWave]

Is this transfer almost done? So a guy (slbsn) posted in twitter about a Debt Spurs owes the bank around 100m and maybe the only they pay that back is the sale of Kane? (The idea seems a bit far-fetched but who knows...)

 

[stan bowles]

Not my kind of player (not that that matters) - just not a player I could warm too. Haarland any day over Kane. If Kane does end up joining us then you can bet that his knack for backing into an opposition player, already off his feet, would be called out in an instant as dangerous and to be clamped down upon. Currently it gets ignored.

 

[Claytop]

 

[oh right]

Personally I do care a bit what we pay for players.
Although we clearly have a big budget it is not unlimited, every extra pound we spend on one player that is unproductive is one less that we can spend on another and I want a successful team more than I want any one player.
None of this is to say that Kane is not worth a lot of money or that he is not more valuable to us than to Spurs because we have better players to maximize his abilities but there is clearly a price at which we may have overpaid and assuming he is successful another at which he represents a bargain.
What those prices are I don't know but for the success of the team I would prefer the price to be closer to the bargain than the overpay.

The fee will be undisclosed anyway mate so no one will ever truly know what we have paid despite a load of guesswork from journalists etc. If city feel its fine to pay £150 million for Harry Kane then it’s fine to pay £150 million for him. The blokes in charge who have put us in a situation where we’ve won 5 titles within the last 10 years countless other domestic cups and within 90 mins of a champions league trophy know a fair bit more than people on an Internet forum moaning about transfer fees.

 

[ColinBellsjockstrap]

"Cor, she wouldn't walk for a week if I got hold of her"