No1 was Colin bell
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Feb 2013
- Messages
- 514
Prick. Fuck off. Jog on. Glad we didn’t embarrass ourselves with a ridiculous bid. Mbappe anyone?
Way too much sense here for BM pal :-)This saga probably reflects more negatively on Spurs than ourselves.
I think its to our credit we didn't go scattergun and we pursued our No1 target, although unsuccessfully.
- Kane obviously wanted to further his career at a bigger club such as City
- No City player wanted to go to Spurs as part of an exchange
- Spurs are left with an unhappy and depreciating asset (albeit a very talented one)
We are the best run Football club in the world.....I am sure we have a an alternative plan.
Spurs will seriously regret not selling him in a year or two. We offered well above what he was worth. They could have come out of this with a stronger squad and with players that actually want to play for their club. I said from the start that Spurs look a much more dangerous side when Kane doesn't play. Kane becomes too much the focus, to the point that if you take care of Kane then they usually have no answer. They're a different side when Lucas Moura plays instead. Far more threatening on the counterattack and Son plays with more freedom.
The hateful 8 wont deal with us aw diddums.Fuck them They didnt object to The dippers and rags winning.Mind u they are all in the same boat now winning fuck all as we dominate.Maybe, it's not like there are a ton of high profile moves between PL clubs anyway.
Guess you will have to stop booing the captain of your club now :-()Why will we regret not selling the likely golden boot winner world class striker? It's not like we paid anything for him in the first place. If Spurs wanted to sell we'd have picked up the phone and negotiated. Also, who are these magical players we can sign that gives us a stronger squad? We can't attract elite players being in the conference and the ones that were interested like Martinez, aren't for sale.
Also, Moura is crap.