Mr Blue Moon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 May 2013
- Messages
- 2,688
I think Kane would be overpriced for the few prime seasons he has left. Our current strategy seems to be getting young players then allowing them to develop
Have you really seen how many games Kane has actually played over the past 3 seasons ? No I thought not.More ignorance !!Both great players and would have either.
But 3 years of Kane injuries and mark ability.
Or 5 years ( possibly more ) world brand and with youth possibly less injuries.
It's a no brainer
And if signing him allows Haaland to join a domestic rival?
Sheesh, I'd rather you call me a tw@t than a rag ;)Rag.
I think it's more the likelihood of us signing Kane over Haaland now. Those who maybe said no in the first instance for Kane would have said no because their first choice would have been Haaland. But over the last few days there has definitely been a shift in movement and there seems to be some noises coming out that Kane does want to leave and we are favourites at this stage. Saying that we are always linked and in the top 3 favourites for the best players in the world in every transfer window anyway.the voting has shifted from not signing kane to signing kane. How media influences???
Did I say this season ?Have you really seen how many games Kane has actually played over the past 3 seasons ? No I thought not.More ignorance !!
It would have to be “corrected“ by outing Phil as a closet rag and Kane as a kiddy fiddler.Can you imagine? The national team captain and the media's favorite English star Kane, with Foden, possibly the country's brightest young talent, both plying their trade for lil ol' Citeh. Think some of them won't be able to bear it!
Following the poll here. Interesting how the Yes has been slowly pulling up