Because no one in there right mind would sign Kane for £100 million if they thought they could get Haaland for £150 million, the games we went through last year with Messi was to prove we could get the best not the also ran`s, and Kane good as he is, is an also ran......and you know Haaland is "first choice" how exactly? Lol
Thanks for the update on this threadHe is great, he is shit,Hes ok,
Haaland is better lets get messi!
That is simply only your opinion.....albeit an interesting one ;)Because no one in there right mind would sign Kane for £100 million if they thought they could get Haaland for £150 million, the games we went through last year with Messi was to prove we could get the best not the also ran`s, and Kane good as he is, is an also ran.
Did we get Messi then?Because no one in there right mind would sign Kane for £100 million if they thought they could get Haaland for £150 million, the games we went through last year with Messi was to prove we could get the best not the also ran`s, and Kane good as he is, is an also ran.
Hahaha get to bed, can’t still be on the sauce from last nightBecause no one in there right mind would sign Kane for £100 million if they thought they could get Haaland for £150 million, the games we went through last year with Messi was to prove we could get the best not the also ran`s, and Kane good as he is, is an also ran.
Did we go for Messi or to prove we could?Did we get Messi then?
well the last 3 are true to be fair!I've seen some funny things on here...
. Get Lukaku
. Get Ings
. Don't sign anyone and play Torres
. Kane is like Bony
. Glass Ankles
. Don't sign him he speaks funny
. He's an ugly cnut
Get over it. He's class and no not cos he scored 2 tonight, cos of how good he's been over the years in the best league in the world.
well the last 3 are true to be fair!
no they are not....but its still trueYeah but didn't he play more games than most of our squad? Genuine question by the way I'm sure someone posted a stat or something like that?
Yeah but the last 2 are not reasons why you shouldn't sign a class striker.
no they are not....but its still true
His ankle issues stretch back at least 9-10 years so there is significant history with that injury problem
Yet he still plays a lot of games every year. Outscores most. Spurs probably rush him back due to relying on him. We’ve also just released the greatest striker in our history, does his constant injuries tarnish what he achieved?no they are not....but its still true
His ankle issues stretch back at least 9-10 years so there is significant history with that injury problem
There was a question floating around at the Spurs forum i wanna put it here.
Does winning a trophy with England satiates Kane love for trophies and he decides to stay put at Spurs or does that makes him wanna come here even more ? The addiction to silverware!
England coming close to the trophy and not winning it would definitely make it certain he would be coming to us.
Yea at 20m, not 100m plus and I would imagine wages and bonuses far higher than Gundo.We signed Gundogan with a history of injury problems that didn't end up too bad for us.
So if he was injured you think we would not rush back our 100m pound main striker?Yet he still plays a lot of games every year. Outscores most. Spurs probably rush him back due to relying on him. We’ve also just released the greatest striker in our history, does his constant injuries tarnish what he achieved?
You tend to pay more for the best striker in the leagueYea at 20m, not 100m plus and I would imagine wages and bonuses far higher than Gundo.
I was talking about buying players with injury issues.You tend to pay more for the best striker in the league