You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
EL APACHE TEVEZ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 23,437
Kane will rock up on the 16th august mark my words, that peevish twat levy won’t want him playing against them.
BillyShears
Well-Known Member
Think Kane will surprise a few here and will really push this move through
That's my vibe too. I get the feeling that Harry is desperate for this move to come off. Plus he'll know that the onus will be on him to force it through.
come-on-barney
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2007
- Messages
- 12,110
Kane holds all the cards. If he states his head is not in the right place to play and believes he had an agreement to leave, Nuno will be left without a striker and no money to purchase one. His value will drop and Levy will want the deal done. All down to him now to force it through.
samuelyeboah
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 May 2021
- Messages
- 6,895
- Team supported
- Manchester City
is it now? didn't we know kane *believes* he has a gentlemen's agreement for a while now?It is. The fact that there are now reports of a gentlemen's agreement to leave make it a decent scoop at the very least
The biggest obstacle to this transfer seems to me that Levy/Spurs have no intention of selling Kane. There was talk recently that Spurs would let Kane go but I am not sure I believe this. Do they look like a club that is planning on life without Kane? This could go on for 12 months because I don't see an alternative for City, and City won the league title last season without a striker so there's no need for City to move on. If Levy wants to play the long game, let him, he will lose.
Better to reiterate the reports, in what is seemingly an important week for his future, and that the narrative hasn't changed. It is good news, that's all.is it now? didn't we know kane *believes* he has a gentlemen's agreement for a while now?
Don't get this forum, post a source and 'we knew this!' post something like you know 'wheres the source pal' lol
Would rather we had Ings & Jesus up front this season and then went for Haaland next summer. Kane's going to be finished in 2/3 years because of his dodgy ankles and we're going to end up needing to spend another £100m to replace him. If we're going to spend stupid money on a striker I'd rather we spent it on someone who's 22 and has his whole career ahead of him rather than someone who's 28 and will likely be done before his contract expires.
I can't see him doing that and unfair to expect him to do so. Kane's future casts a giant shadow over their club. Let it hover there for a year if necessary. We can wait. We are the Champions. City can go again with this squad.Kane holds all the cards. If he states his head is not in the right place to play and believes he had an agreement to leave, Nuno will be left without a striker and no money to purchase one. His value will drop and Levy will want the deal done. All down to him now to force it through.
tolmie's hairdoo
Well-Known Member
The biggest obstacle to this transfer seems to me that Levy/Spurs have no intention of selling Kane. There was talk recently that Spurs would let Kane go but I am not sure I believe this. Do they look like a club that is planning on life without Kane? This could go on for 12 months because I don't see an alternative for City, and City won the league title last season without a striker so there's no need for City to move on. If Levy wants to play the long game, let him, he will lose.
They have spoken directly to Kane to say he can leave.
Has been told to keep his head down and leave it to the negotiators.
doobyedoobye
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 5,492
This is Kane’s big chance. He won’t let us down..
Indaparkside
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2015
- Messages
- 15,553
He’s not going to win fuck all with England or spuds, stones probably showed him his collection of medals while on international duty to swing it
Kane holds all the cards. If he states his head is not in the right place to play and believes he had an agreement to leave, Nuno will be left without a striker and no money to purchase one. His value will drop and Levy will want the deal done. All down to him now to force it through.
He holds some of the cards. As do City.
But so do Spurs, primarily in the form of 3 years remaining on his contract.
Kane is desperate to leave now. City really want to pull out all the stops for Guardiola. They could wait. But I don't think they're of a mind to.
So I'd say that the balance of power in this negotiation is fairly evenly poised.
samuelyeboah
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 May 2021
- Messages
- 6,895
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I was more so laughing at simon stone for not presenting any new information.Better to reiterate the reports, in what is seemingly an important week for his future, and that the narrative hasn't changed. It is good news, that's all.
Don't get this forum, post a source and 'we knew this!' post something like you know 'wheres the source pal' lol
Well, most of the rag journos rinse, repeat. But in this case I don't mind it since even they can't deny it's really onI was more so laughing at simon stone for not presenting any new information.
If you expect Kane to go on striker then I think that's unfair. He wont do that. He might make it very clear to Spurs management that he feels let down but what else can he do but play?
We can play the long game if necessary. I dont see an alternative. If Spurs were serious about selling the player they would have done it imo. They will claim he has a price and he will go if City meet it but imo they know they can't replace him so this is a front only. They will gamble on keeping him for 12 months and hoping that somehow the battlefield changes. It's impossible to read as a fan so I am well aware that this is probably well off the mark
We can play the long game if necessary. I dont see an alternative. If Spurs were serious about selling the player they would have done it imo. They will claim he has a price and he will go if City meet it but imo they know they can't replace him so this is a front only. They will gamble on keeping him for 12 months and hoping that somehow the battlefield changes. It's impossible to read as a fan so I am well aware that this is probably well off the mark
OK. Only just seen your comment. I'll accept that then. In that case I am bemused that Spurs are not more active in the transfer market but that is their look out.They have spoken directly to Kane to say he can leave.
Has been told to keep his head down and leave it to the negotiators.
Wanchope n me Dickov
Well-Known Member
Steaming. I can almost taste the aroma.
They're in for Vlahovic at £50m aren't they? Presumed that was far along, might have misreadOK. Only just seen your comment. I'll accept that then. In that case I am bemused that Spurs are not more active in the transfer market but that is their look out.