citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 14,047
But they're the same teammates that got him the golden boot and top assistsI'm talking the quality of his teammates, Messi would struggle in that Spurs side.
But they're the same teammates that got him the golden boot and top assistsI'm talking the quality of his teammates, Messi would struggle in that Spurs side.
Or maybe he's that next level up :)But they're the same teammates that got him the golden boot and top assists
Messi has miracles at Barcelona in a few seasons, carrying over the line a team in shambles, with bad manager work and a weak team. He is a decisive player, like some others, even in weaker teams. It happens. Lucas Moura playing for this very Tottenham team scored a hattrick against Ajax to take them to a UCL final. He was a killer in that game. If we’re gonna spend the money required for Kane, it should be for a killer in the moments that matter. It’s completely irrelevant whether the striker we sign is the top goalscorer of the league or not. We don’t need that to win titles. Why would someone like André Silva be any worse than Kane, for much less money? What would Kane offer more than Silva to justify the money (it’s just an example)?I'm talking the quality of his teammates, Messi would struggle in that Spurs side.
His international record is decent. 41 in 98 gamesIf we judged Sergio solely on his international form, we’d never have signed him!
And Kane has 34 in 56. Damn sight better ratio than Sergio.His international record is decent. 41 in 98 games
Do you mind I put my leotard on just for this thread : )Alot of gymnastics going on in this thread for and against kane haha
Hope soI don’t see Kane coming to City, reminds me of the Sanchez shenanigans when Wenger made sure he didn’t come to City. City won’t pay £150m for him and Spurs won’t let him go for £100m to another English club, could see him going to PSG or even a cloak and dagger “arrangement“ for him to go to Stretford.