Harry Kane

You can say that but you would be wrong. Kane is at worst the 3rd best striker in the world.

And by all means complain about the price, I have no issue with that as I said earlier. But saying he isn't good enough is just a lie.

Genuinely, never said he wasn't good enough, no need to twist it. I said he wasnt 'the best' (which is subjective anyway) as is repeatedly aggresively claimed, and anyone that dare think othersise is labled all sorts of crap.

The only reason it matters anyway because ot is relative to a price that could get a top player AND profile.

Yes, I think the price it would take is way too much for what we'd be getting.
 
Maybe the news of City bidding 100m is a bluff to entice others into the fray. Whilst the others are lining up their bids City are busy getting the deal done for Haaland.
 
So… is Kane still overrated and overpriced with dodgy ankles or have we accepted that he is 1 of the best forwards in world football with an obscene goal +assist tally and maybe he is not as injury prone as some would have you believe?

Either way, levy and Spurs can get fucked for anything over £100 million ;)
 
So… is Kane still overrated and overpriced with dodgy ankles or have we accepted that he is 1 of the best forwards in world football with an obscene goal +assist tally and maybe he is not as injury prone as some would have you believe?

Either way, levy and Spurs can get fucked for anything over £100 million ;)
Anything north of 100 million is called “messi money “
Hope levy and kane is aware of that comparable sale .
 
We should stick our offer on their table and not budge from it because we need to ditch being a soft touch and become as hard nosed as Levy.

They have to reject the first offer for appearances.

City go back with a little more to create the impression that Levy has negotiated firmly.

If they really do dig in after that then agreed, I'd walk away. Don't want to end up like Woodward with Sancho last summer.
 
Na, your obsession with semantics to try argue a point on technicalities says it all.

Kane is on the same level as Mane and Vardy, and below Aguero and Salah. Even arguably useless Sterling in 2 of the last 3 seasons.

Not sure why the obsession to argue he has to be proclaimes the absolute best. If you really want it so bad, he is the best English striker, that plays centrally, under the age of 30 over the height of 5.4 feet.

Tbf he’s one of the top central strikers in the world with Haaland, Ronaldo and Lewandowski. His record in terms of goals and even assists speaks for itself.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.