Harry Kane

[Coatigan]

Who do you think is the best striker in the league then?

The other person I asked hasn't responded yet but I feel it must be missing the obvious answer.

Is it Rashford or Watkins, I didn't consider those last time. Maybe Iheanacho or Lacazette?

Aguero was. Then Salah.

Thereafter there is a level of Kane, Mane, Vardy, who are there or thereabouts depending on the timing.

Not arguing any of them woukd be any better a signing for us to make btw.

 

[Man_City_Loyal]

Idiots said he wasn’t even worth 50 mil. My question was find someone with his numbers for 50 mil. You won’t.

closest to that be Lukaku at a push

 

[EdersonsSmiley]

Aguero was. Then Salah.

Thereafter there is a level of Kane, Mane, Vardy, who are there or thereabouts depending on the timing.

Not arguing any of them woukd be any better a signing for us to make btw.

So your answer is someone who plays for Barcelona or a winger?

Says it all tbh.

 

[willipp]

So your answer is someone who plays for Barcelona or a winger?

Says it all tbh.

Best striker in the league is usually the one who scores the most goals. Aguero hasnt been the best striker in the league for a good few seasons now, that on the whole has been Kane.

 

[samuelyeboah]

Not only do I not think Salah is strictly better than Kane, Salah is very much not a striker. Kane is top 5 strikers in the world, maybe top 3 even. Like, how are we even having this discussion, dude just finished top goalscorer & top assists with a team that finished 7th!!

 

[EdersonsSmiley]

Not only do I not think Salah is strictly better than Kane, Salah is very much not a striker. Kane is top 5 strikers in the world, maybe top 3 even. Like, how are we even having this discussion, dude just finished top goalscorer & top assists with a team that finished 7th!!

It's bizzare.

You can say you think he's too old, too slow, too injury prone, not suited to our team etc but you cannot say he isn't a world class striker.

 

[Centurions]

It's bizzare.

You can say you think he's too old, too slow, too injury prone, not suited to our team etc but you cannot say he isn't a world class striker.

While naming players who are all older at that.

 

[marc_mcfc90]

I am probably going to get absolutely ripped apart for this….

but with everything that is going on at Spurs I don’t half feel bad for daniel levy

 

[leo_city]

So you would tell me Kane is also a better buy than Mbappe (not a “finished article”)?

For us? Absolutely.

If we're talking in general and speculating who would you buy as just any club between Mbappé or Kane then the answer is former. Context with wage/agent/possibility of actually getting him/playstyle etc etc is different when we're talking City.

 

[Coatigan]

So your answer is someone who plays for Barcelona or a winger?

Says it all tbh.

Na, your obsession with semantics to try argue a point on technicalities says it all.

Kane is on the same level as Mane and Vardy, and below Aguero and Salah. Even arguably useless Sterling in 2 of the last 3 seasons.

Not sure why the obsession to argue he has to be proclaimes the absolute best. If you really want it so bad, he is the best English striker, that plays centrally, under the age of 30 over the height of 5.4 feet.