Harry Kane

[Tugay One Cup]

Oh for fuck's sake. Better get the blue cones out.

 

[RandomJ]

Could you imagine the sheer amount of boiled piss if we spent £200 million on a single player?

 

[RayCTID]

Could you imagine the sheer amount of boiled piss if we spent £200 million on a single player?

Yep its not going to be Kane

 

[I'm Blue]

City would never spend £200 million on a single player who is 27 years old (and injury prone)

I fucking hope not!

 

[himalayan_blues]

100 million with 20 million add ons will be good business for the 3 parties involved.

 

[Dax777]

Meh! He is older than his age in Football years. He's a 27 year old with the body of a 31 year-old. Stay the fuck away from this guy

 

[OB1]

Explain, why its laughable

LOL

 

[eastlandsblue]

I get your reasoning but Mbappé is already world class with so much room to grow while Kane is closing in on 30 and getting worryingly injury prone.
The risk of Mbappé doing a Sané would be worth it IMO, especially when you have the small chance of Mbappé leading the line for a decade or more.

If I thought Mbappe would stick around for longer than 3 yrs, then I'd have him. But that's unlikely once Pep goes

 

[blue ranger]

I don't care if he scores 7 million goals domestically or internationally, it doesn't make him a guaranteed success here. At best it limits risk to some degree, it most certainly doesn't and never will provide a guarantee.

Of course, but surely you must accept the riskis lower with a player that has consistently performed in the premier league. No?

 

[rabby]

If I thought Mbappe would stick around for longer than 3 yrs, then I'd have him. But that's unlikely once Pep goes

If he stuck around for 3 years and we sold him on for a probable profit it would be fantastic business,but as others have said ain't gonna happen