Fair enough.Yes it does.
The system Southgate is currently playing is horrendous. He took Kane off, brought Rashford on, and he could barely get 4-5 touches too. Injury caution has a massive impact on your performance, not sure how you are simply undermining the factor. Also there was barely any service. Him and Foden ghosting for 2 games doesn't make them shite clearly. Not sure why everyone is judging players off a game or 2 especially in NT where the performances usually differ from club level
Fair enough.
I have never spent £100m+++ on a player previously myself. But let's just say if it was my money, I'd be feeling a bit nervous about it.
Like you'e buying a car which gets rave reviews and you go for a test drive and it misfires badly and has no power, but the seller says don't worry it must just be having an off day.
A front 3 with Kane, Raheem & Foden is not working well.
Why is he half fit?That is a far more valid observation than just criticising a half fit Kane.
In fairness none of the three looked their best.
Kane comes to deep. England should play to his strengthsThat is a far more valid observation than just criticising a half fit Kane.
In fairness none of the three looked their best.
That is a far more valid observation than just criticising a half fit Kane.
In fairness none of the three looked their best.
A front 3 with Kane, Raheem & Foden is not working well.
Don’t think he ever had pace. That’s not his game.Does anyone think hes lost a yard of pace due to those ankle injuries over the years ?
If we buy Kane.. I will guarantee by his second season he will become the poster boy of hatred in the match day thread. Just a feeling but I think he could be our Shevchenko, Veron or Hazard (Real).. as in a huge high profile flop.. something that we’ve managed to avoid thus far!
Kane has out scored Aguero before in seasons but that seems to not matter if it doesn't suit the view point.
As I have previously posted some don't want Kane, that is fine, no issue with that opinion, I am 50/50 on it tbh, but the arguements why others are a better option (bar cost)are very thin
Why is he half fit?
Fair enough, how would he cope trying to close down defenders in our team ?Don’t think he ever had pace. That’s not his game.
That’s exactly how I see him, he scored lots of goals but I have never seen him play and think wow he is an excellent player. The best game I have seen him play was against us in November.It's a very strange one, you can't argue with his numbers, but I've always said there's something about him and have never rated him,
Haarland is the only one worth the money in my opinion. If he is unavailable then wait until the right person comes along. Go for Haarland next summer and sort out the other areas thisIt is all relative to cost though. That is the point. For 50m, great, snap him up. For 120m, everything comes into question, his numbers, age, pace etc.
It would be interesting to see some analysis on how players performed after massive transfers. What % matched and exceeded the expectations..
Kane comes to deep. England should play to his strengths
to me Haarland is someone who can make a goal out of nothing and I don’t feel I can say the same if Kane.If you go by the really big fees, examples of those that performed (mbappe, neymar, ronalady - to Real) vs the more numerous flops, you could notice that the younger the player the better they coped with it.
Going for Haaland over Kane for the same price just makes more sense.
well raz has been turgid all season anyway and Kane looks both tired and distracted imo. Foden was a brighter spot for me last night but looked frustrated at the lack of movement from his team mates which we always have at city? People need to remember Kane would be in a pep team with WAY better players than england currently have?