Harry Kane

Lkzerinho said:
At what point does United try to come in and outbid us?

For instance, had Spurs accepted the most recent bid we made and United decided to match it and threw more money at Kane?

I get the sense here, everyone believes the price is just obscene, why we're the only ones in for him because we need a striker desperately,

Wonder what number we will go to.
Click to expand...

They won’t united are struggling with sancho from dortmund reports united want to pay the Sancho fee over a 3 to 4 year period. Where would they get money for Kane
 
LangleyBlue1970 said:
We sign full backs for half that reported £100m, so logic suggests paying double that for the best striker in the league isn’t so bad of an idea.
Click to expand...
We shouldn't be looking to drive up player values when we don't need to. Kane has said he wants to leave. Levy/Spurs need money. Kane apparently only wants to join City. No other clubs seem to have made any positive move to get him. Kane will eventually worm his way out of Spurs.

Offer £75m and start negotiating. If anyone else offers in excess of £85m, let them have him.

We'd be better re-signing Aguero.
 
Mentioning Aguero leaving for nothing is a bit disingenuous. He hardly played over the last 12 months of his contract and sadly couldn't be relied on anymore.
He could have stayed but chose not to.
 
Bluesince88 said:
First of all he runs his tits off, seen him bust a gut many times to get on the end of things. Didn’t everyone say aguero couldn’t press the way Pep would want? Did he adapt despite his age? Yes. I’d also expect a wide man to run more than a striker. A fox in the box with what we create would make us ten times more clinical: something we haven’t been
Click to expand...
He runs his tits off like he's running in treacle. 100 million will not get him, I reckon 50% more with possibility of player swap and in my opinion is too much for someone his age with glass ankles. I would rather pay 150 million for Haaland with a good 10 years at least at the top level in front of him
 
Looks likes were doing this....

If he signs I hope he proves me wrong.

Throw Raheem in and I reckon there's a deal.
 
Phil Mitchell Foden said:
At risk of sounding like a spoilt **** this is really grim. The kind of money we're getting towards here would secure Halaand. Have no idea why we're going down this route with Levy for Kane.

If we end up with Kane and Haaland went to Chelsea I think we'd very much live to regret it.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't call you a spolit **** I just think you're underestimating how good kane is
 
Lavinda Past said:
Whose fault was it he wasn't playing then...?
Click to expand...
Stop being stupid please...he was injured plus we were in the hunt for all 4 trophies without him

We all love Sergio but he wasn't the best striker in the league for the past 2 years - was it peps fault he was injured too?
 
swinton blue said:
It looks like spurs have leaked the interest from us in kane.
Spurs know he wants to go so the best thing for spurs is to start a bidding war. Hence this news today.
Or we will get blamed for England's failure in the euros because kanes head wasn't on the game
Click to expand...
Hahahaha I was waiting for this one
 
Lavinda Past said:
We already had the best striker in the league but let him walk away for nothing.
Click to expand...
Remember when you said this on April 4th?

^^^ This 100%

There's no room for sentiment. Sergio was light years behind the rest of the team yesterday, and while he may yet pop up with the occasional goal, he simply doesn't fit into the current Pep system, and is now a bench player at best.

TV made much of this being Sergio's "farewell tour"... I sincerely wouldn't expect Pep / City to fall into that trap - I'd hate to see Aguero become our 2021 version of Rodney Marsh
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top