Harry Kane

Sam1980 said:
Why is it good business keeping 2 players that want to leave and by keeping them we will most like miss out on our much needed top target. It’s bad business if you ask me more so with silva than Laporte as we have loads of players to fill in for silva
Click to expand...
Watching Saturdays game should give you the answer to that. From what I saw the Way these guys played, didn’t look that way to me.....
 
A
waspish said:
Maybe but who is in charge here seems Kane could tell them to forget it but if all this is true he is just letting them get on with it! Players hey can’t control there own destiny!
Click to expand...
After signing a 6 year deal with a gentleman’s agreement it’s probably best Kane never has anything to do with any deal ever again
 
From City's perspective if they genuinely would not entertain going for Haaland next summer they need to do everything to buy Kane now.

Imagine we waited till next summer and Mbappe has gone on a free to Real and someone has bought Haaland for 75m and we're doing a deal for 120m for Kane again. We'd all be fuming.

Options will be more limited next summer too as Vlahovic will likely be at Atletico and Lewandowski and Ronaldo would be non starters with their ages. City will want to avoid that striker circus next year and the pressure of having to sign Haaland with the salary demands that would come so can see them really pushing this through this week.
 
phargrave said:
Watching Saturdays game should give you the answer to that. From what I saw the Way these guys played, didn’t look that way to me.....
Click to expand...
Just because they play well doesn’t mean they want to leave. By all accounts Kane played well the few minutes he was on
 
MarsLlama said:
I just do not agree with that at all. The most marketable player is the one who'll sell the most shirts regardless of number. If I had to guess, worldwide, City probably sell more shirts with Mahrez on the back than anyone except De Bruyne.
Click to expand...
What number is Debruyne again? Is it 34 or something. My point is who cares? But who knows what these commercially obsessed PR people haggle over
 
JustAnotherCityFan said:
From City's perspective if they genuinely would not entertain going for Haaland next summer they need to do everything to buy Kane now.

Imagine we waited till next summer and Mbappe has gone on a free to Real and someone has bought Haaland for 75m and we're doing a deal for 120m for Kane again. We'd all be fuming.

Options will be more limited next summer too as Vlahovic will likely be at Atletico and Lewandowski and Ronaldo would be non starters with their ages. City will want to avoid that striker circus next year and the pressure of having to sign Haaland with the salary demands that would come so can see them really pushing this through this week.
Click to expand...
My worry is if we don’t get a striker in the next week is next summer we will need a striker a DM and a LB A lot of money to be laid out next summer
 
Sam1980 said:
Why is it good business keeping 2 players that want to leave and by keeping them we will most like miss out on our much needed top target. It’s bad business if you ask me more so with silva than Laporte as we have loads of players to fill in for silva
Click to expand...
Do you ever say anything positive ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.